Hayne, a politician during Jackson's presidency, raised many issues about State's rights and Slavery. Some of his comments revolved around the tariff of 1828. He said the Tariff, "was producing a spirit of jealousy and distrust" (Meacham 127).
Protectionist tariffs were the subject of the Webster-Hayne debate. The debate occurred in 1830.
Protectionist tariffs and nullification
The whig
http://www.ehow.com/about_5070480_significance-websterhayne-debate.html This website gives you the resolution and everyone's personal view!! it helped me tremendously!!
Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster - stella
Derpyderp
right of states to nullify federal laws
I'm not sure if this is totally correct because I'm just learning this in AP US but Calhoun was Hayne's "coach" so to speak in the debate and Jackson ended up siding with Webster, drawing a sharper line between the two men. Contributing to their controversy was the whole Peggy Eaton affair.
http://www.ehow.com/about_5070480_significance-websterhayne-debate.html This website gives you the resolution and everyone's personal view!! it helped me tremendously!!
The Webster-Hayne Debate was between a man named Daniel Webster and a man named Robert Hayne.
Daniel Webster
slavery
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
Daniel Webster strongly opposed nullification and believed that the federal government was above the states. This is made clear in the Webster-Hayne Debate of 1830, where Webster argued against pro-nullification South Carolina senator Robert Hayne.
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
In the debate, Webster argued that states did not have the power to nullify a federal law. He also argued that states could not secede from the Union. Daniel Webster held several offices throughout his career, including Senator from Massachusetts.
Daniel Webster
Daniel Webster and Henry Clay were the two men involved in the "Great Debate."
The nullification crisis voided the tariff laws imposed by the US government on South Carolina. Robert Hayne of South Carolina interpreted the Constitution as a mere treaty between states, while Daniel Webster defended the Constitution. This became known as the Hayne-Webster debate.