501 = DI
501=DI
Yes the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N but there was no need to use it because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self explanatory. For example to write out 501 we need to include a zero to represent its real value but the equivalent of 501 in Roman numerals is DI which does not require a zero symbol.
64 in Roman numerals is LXIV
Roman numerals don't have a 0 symbol and so it is an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
In Roman numerals, twelve is represented by the symbol "XII".
501=DI
Yes the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N but there was no need to use it because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self explanatory. For example to write out 501 we need to include a zero to represent its real value but the equivalent of 501 in Roman numerals is DI which does not require a zero symbol.
64 in Roman numerals is LXIV
Roman numerals do not have any symbol occurring consecutively more than three (or sometimes four) times. A number such as 9000 would be written as the symbol IX (the Roman numeral for 9) with a horizontal line over the top. The horizontal line indicates the number is multiplied by ten thousand.The remainder of the number would be written as 501 is normally written: DI
Roman numerals don't have a 0 symbol and so it is an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
The lack of a zero symbol creates no problems with Roman numerals.
In Roman numerals, twelve is represented by the symbol "XII".
There is no symbol in Roman numerals to represent zero.
2009 in Roman numerals is MMIX.
LXV
LVI
A zero symbol.