maybe sainis will be higher then jatt as they have more closeness to rajputs
Caste hierarchy can vary depending on regions and communities in India. In some regions, Jats might be considered higher caste than Sainis, while in others the hierarchy could be different. It's important to remember that caste distinctions are a social construct and not indicative of individual worth or capabilities.
saini cause there rajputs
Yes, the surname Baidya is commonly associated with the Bengali Brahmin caste, which is considered high-caste in the Hindu social hierarchy, rather than the Scheduled Caste category.
Caste systems vary regionally in India, so it is not accurate to compare the two castes on a hierarchy. Both Jatav and Katiyar belong to different caste groups, and their social status can be influenced by various factors like region, occupation, and historical context.
There is no universal measure of the size of different castes as it can vary depending on location and population demographics. Both Jatav and Katiyar castes are significant in certain regions of India, and their size can be comparable depending on the context.
Both Tomar and Bhadoria are sub-castes within the broader Kshatriya varna in the Indian caste system. There is no hierarchy between them in general, as caste hierarchies can vary across regions and communities.
No, surnames are not definitive indicators of caste in all cases. Caste can vary within surnames and is not solely determined by a person's last name. It is important to recognize individuals based on their skills, character, and actions rather than assumptions based on their surname.
i think jatt are better than all
cant say it surely but maybe yes
No. Kumar is not a caste specific name. Sainis are a separate caste group than Jatts.
Kamboh are not totally considered as chamar but they are also belong to the backward class agriculture caste but as non jatt . Kamboh can easily assimilated with Chamar than to jatt. inter caste marriages between kamboh and Chamar are common in Punjab and Haryana
By Origin yes Sainis are above jatts. Jatts are refugee tribe of India came from Kazakistan. Sainis are vedic kshytriya and belong to Mathura from Maharaja Shoorsen (grandfather of Lord Krishna).
Gangar are majorly Khatri (kshatriya) from Punjab doaba region. Gangar Jatt/Tarkhan are also there. Most are in farming and trade. But , now no caste should be considered higher or lower.
Sikhism explicitly outlaws any caste-based stratification of society. Caste- or nobility-based surnames are therefore not allowed for Sikhs. And therefore, you cannot claim to be both a Sikh and a Jatt. This-as well as the obvious reason that there is no such thing as a uniquely "Sikh" surname other than Singh (for males) and Kaur (for females)-renders the question of "Raj" moot.
No
Yes.
Bahti is One of largest group of Jatts in punjab.it is mixed group of jatt in which both types of jatts are found Hindu or Punjabi Both.but this caste has mani issues among people ,people are living in many defences.most occupation of this group is agriculture.in ancient time,people acquire 62 acres and that's they called bati,nad became Bahti with passage of time. Before that thay were bahniwal and were jimidar people but in 1800s,during sikh times ,,many bahti's become sikh and so,they become bahniwal jatt.but this community was not completly under siikhism. most part of it ,is also in hindu because many people left from this. today, people are liviny in many defences but real is that bahti are bahniawal jatt. and they are diffrent from other caste people like rajput,ghirth,Chang. these castes mostly have many defences.but is higher than saini's, rajputs.but,today ,this caste has not any minister .due to it,it is going backward. it is also found thay people are living by hiding their caste. but we need awareness as soon as possible we can do.
it is not specific enough. If you are lookking for a number that is bigger than 5, count higer
One meter is 39.3701 times greater than one foot.