0
What key observation did the classical model attempt to explain?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
The classical model attempted to explain the long-run aggregate supply of goods and services in an economy, emphasizing the role of factors like capital, labor, and technology in determining an economy's potential output. It also focused on the idea that in the long run, wages and prices are flexible and will adjust to ensure full employment of resources.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does observation change a model?
Observation can help refine and improve a model by providing real-world data for validation and comparison. It can also be used to identify any discrepancies or errors in the model's assumptions or predictions. Additionally, observation can help increase the model's accuracy and reliability by incorporating new information.
Problems with Rutherford model?
The Rutherford model fails to explain the stability of atoms, as electrons in orbit around the nucleus according to classical physics would emit radiation and spiral into the nucleus. Additionally, the model cannot explain the discrete energy levels of electrons observed in the atomic spectra. Quantum mechanics later provided a more accurate description of the atom.
Was rutherfords model of the atom incorrect or incomplete explain answer?
Rutherford's model of the atom was incomplete. He proposed a model in which electrons orbit the positively charged nucleus like planets around the sun. However, this model failed to explain the stability of the atom and the energy levels of electrons. It was later improved upon by Niels Bohr's model, which incorporated quantum mechanics concepts to explain these phenomena.
How did Rutherford explain his observation?
Rutherford explained his observation by proposing that atoms have a small, dense nucleus at the center that contains a positive charge. He suggested that electrons move around the nucleus in orbit, and that most of an atom's mass is concentrated in the nucleus. This explanation led to the development of the nuclear model of the atom.
Why was the nuclear model insufficient?
The nuclear model was insufficient because it couldn't explain the stability of atoms with more than one electron. It also failed to account for the continuous spectrum of light emitted by atoms in contrast to the discrete emission lines predicted by the model. Lastly, the model couldn't explain the chemical properties and behavior of elements accurately.
What was the Bohr model an attempt to explain?
The Bohr model was an attempt to explain the structure of the hydrogen atom, specifically the discrete energy levels of electrons and the transitions between these levels that produce spectral lines. It proposed that electrons orbit the nucleus in fixed circular paths at specific distances, or energy levels.
What does observation change a model?
Observation can help refine and improve a model by providing real-world data for validation and comparison. It can also be used to identify any discrepancies or errors in the model's assumptions or predictions. Additionally, observation can help increase the model's accuracy and reliability by incorporating new information.
What are the assumptions that underlie the classical model of decision-making and explain how this model would help to explain the behavior of a manager who was attempting to act consistently with thi?
The classical model of decision-making assumes that individuals are rational, have access to all information, evaluate all options, and choose the optimal solution. This model suggests that a manager, acting in a manner consistent with it, would thoroughly assess all available options, weigh the pros and cons logically, and select the best alternative based on objective criteria, maximizing utility or profit.
What happened to the existing model of the Universe after Galileo's observation?
Galileo is famous for observing and proving his heliocentric model of the universe. After his observation the existing model of the universe was slowly phased out.
Explain data model?
Explain data model?
Explain the difference between the energy lost or gained by an atom according to the laws of classical physics and according to the quantum model of an atom?
In classical physics, the energy gained or lost by an atom is continuous and can have any value. In contrast, in the quantum model of an atom, the energy gained or lost is quantized, meaning it can only take on certain discrete values determined by the energy levels of the atom. This discreteness of energy levels in the quantum model helps explain phenomena such as atomic spectra and electron transitions.
What is the major reason in earth science for scientists to construct models?
To help make predictions that can be tested by experiment or observation. Also to see or observe the model rather than to just explain it in words.
Identify two problems with your model of the atom?
One problem is that the classical model of the atom fails to explain the stability of the electron orbits around the nucleus, as predicted by classical electromagnetism. Another problem is that it does not account for the wave-particle duality of electrons and other subatomic particles, which is described by quantum mechanics.
What does the operon model attempt explain?
The operon model attempts to explain how genes are regulated in prokaryotic cells. It describes how genes are grouped together into operons, which are clusters of genes that are transcribed together as a single mRNA molecule. The model also explains how the expression of these operons is controlled by regulatory elements such as promoters, repressors, and activators.
What kind of model relies on direct observation measurement and extensive data?
its is an empirical model
Is most of the evidence that's for evolution come from mathematical models true or false?
Evidence, in a scientific context, is an observation that confirms, is consistent with, a falsifiable explanatory model. If a mathematical model is based on sound (consistent with observed reality) premises, and the results from this model are consistent with expectations based on the model under scrutiny, then it is true that the observation that the results are consistent is evidence for the model. If they're not consistent, then the statement that the observation of inconsistency is evidence for the model is false - although this does not necessarily imply that the observation of inconsistency is evidence against the model.No. Most of the theory for evolution comes from fieldwork and personal observation and not mathematical models.
The bureaucratic model of organization is based on the _____ theory?
Classical
