answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Many Tutsi and those Hutu associated with them fought to save their lives. We know of their heroic resistance, usually armed only with sticks and stones, at such places as the hills of Bisesero, the swamps of Bugesera, and the church at Cyahinda, but we have no way of knowing about the countless small encounters where targeted people struggled to defend themselves and their families in their homes, on dusty paths, and in the fields of sorghum.

Some tens of thousands fled to neighboring countries and others hid within Rwanda, in the ceilings of houses, in holes in the ground, in the forest, in the swamps. Some bought their lives once, others paid repeatedly for their safety over a period of weeks, either with money or with sexual services.

Many Tutsi who are alive survived because of the action of Hutu, whether a single act of courage from a stranger or the delivery of food and protection over many weeks by friends or family members.

User Avatar

Brandy Ortiz

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What killing methods were used in Rwandan genocide?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What genocide used machetes as the main killing tool?

The Rwandan genocide.


Do you capitalize the word genocide?

Yes, the word "Genocide" should be capitalized as it refers to a specific term that describes a deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.


How were the men murdered in the Rwandan genocide?

machetes were often used to beat and kill also burning houses down


What were all the causes of deaths on Rwanda Genocide?

In fact, very few of those murdered were shot. This was a situation where low-tech methods of killing were used; the most common weapon was the machete. They purchased thousands of machetes very cheaply from China. Another common weapon was a club studded with spikes/nails. Regardless of the "low-tech" nature of the genocide, it was incredibly lethal with a daily average of 10,000 dead.


What type of genocide was practiced by the Nazis?

The Holocaust, in which they (the Nazis) attempted to wipe out the Jews (an entire group of people)


What were the worst types of killing methods used during the Armenian Genocide?

Letting the people to walk around an area that had no water or food. That was a slow death. The genocide was carried out during and after World War I and implemented in two phases: the wholesale killing of the able-bodied male population through massacre and subjection of army conscripts to forced labor, followed by the deportation of women, children, the elderly and infirm on death marches leading to the Syrian desert.


What were methods used in Ukraine genocide?

Primarily starvation, deportation to gulags, and a shot to the back of the head in a prision was used. Brutall and efficent, this is typical of Stalin. This genocide is a major reason bettwen animosty bettwen Russia nad the Ukraine.


What word means the killing of an entire race?

The word used is genocide. However, this word is also used to denote the killing of a substantial number of members of an ethnic group, forcible transfer, deliberate destruction of an ethnic group's culture.


What is genocide and how did the Nazis use it against the Jews?

A Genocide is the systematic killing of an entire people. The Nazi's used it against the Jews in concentration camps; they killed the entire race of Jews almost, using gas chambers, etc.


What is the money that is used in Rwanda?

The Rwandan FRANCS


Modern term for genocide?

Genocide is the modern term used.


Did the Czech Republic respond to the Rwandan genocide?

Hi there! Yes, the Czech Republic did respond. The Czech Republic responded to the Rwandan genocide by being one of the first countries to call it an actual genocide. Many other countries were cautious to call it a genocide because that implied that they had to punish Rwanda (these countries being: the UK, US, etc). The Czech Republic suggested that Rwanda should split in half (the Hutu in one side and the Tutsi in the other). They suggested this because they had done this themselves earlier in 1993 when they "divorced" Slovakia (used to be Czechoslovakia, remember? :) ). The Czech Republic was furious that the countries in the Security Council were not responding quickly to the issue and were dilly-dallying there time. It was unacceptable to the new country. Hope this helps! This is based on my Model UN experience! :D