bill of attainder
bill of attainder
an example of a bill that is unconstitutional is attainder
A bill is considered unconstitutional if it violates the principles set forth in a country's constitution. This can include legislation that infringes on individual rights, exceeds the powers granted to the government, or conflicts with existing constitutional provisions. For example, a bill that discriminates against a particular group or restricts freedom of speech may be deemed unconstitutional. Ultimately, it is the role of the judiciary to interpret the constitutionality of a bill.
The Judicial Branch
Declaring it unconstitutional.
Parts of laws can and are ruled to be unconstitutional - the remaining provisions stay in tact until and unless they are challenged as well. Parts can be ruled unconstitutional without effecting the entire bill/law.
Yes because the legislative branch can overthrow the veto of the president. The only reason why the president would veto a bill is if it unconstitutional.
You can file in federal court to protect yourself from enforcement of a unconstitutional law. If you lose, you can appeal and if you win enough appeals, the case may get to the Supreme Court which can declare that the law is unconstitutional.
The president is allowed to veto a bill he sees unconstitutional or sign off on a bill. He also has the power to make treaties.
The judicial branch but really all three branches have checks and balances so there is a good chance an unconstitutional would never be passed but it does happen from time to time thus the judicial branches power to declare a law /bill / amendment, unconstitutional
The bill is purported to force private individuals to purchase a service from another private concern, which is, to an extent, unconstitutional.
No it did not. It was vetoed by the president at the time(forget which one) on the grounds that it was unconstitutional.