is this an AP history question? i live in PA and have this question too
The colonists would be freed from Britain's rules and would get to govern themselves.
The British were taxing the colonists for tea and other necessities unfairly. They also would not let the colonists be represented in Britain.
This would seem to be a statement of fact rather than a quaestion.
They could have split the land so that the colonist would have gotten more land to settle on and the king of Britain still got a border.
they first taxed the colonists so everyone would know Britain's in charge. this backfired obviously. they did this because they needed resources from America
Without the war against Britain The Colonists would be subject to the unfair rule and regulation that Great Britain handed to them.
'Welcome' is perfectly acceptable.
The colonists would be freed from Britain's rules and would get to govern themselves.
The British were taxing the colonists for tea and other necessities unfairly. They also would not let the colonists be represented in Britain.
In my opinion,Colonists would be overly excited to get pissed off because of Britain's childish acts. so I say SCREW YOU to Britain
they would lose money and support and equipment and possibly their lives.
This would seem to be a statement of fact rather than a quaestion.
It would have been terrible and we would've stayed together with Britain
We'd most likely still be under British rule. Not that that would a bad thing.
Colonist worried they would lose many things if they became indpendent from Britain. They were afraid they would lose lots of things they imported, and their sense of security.
they were so tired of great Britain telling them what to do
Showed Colonists That The King Would Not Listen To Reason !