Well, there are no stars with no habitable zone or very inferior ones.
Some probably can. A few have been discovered in the habitable zones around their stars, though there other factors in whether or not a planet can support life. Most, however, orbit too close or too far from their stars to support any form of life as we know it.
Temperate zones are either of the two intermediate latitude zones of the earth. Some countries on the temperate zones are Australia, France, the USA, China and New Zealand.
There is no single planet named Kepler; rather Kepler is a prefix added to the designations of planets discovered by the Kepler telescope. Several planets discovered by Kepler, including Kepler-438b, Kepler-442b, Kepler 440b, and Kepler 296f, orbit in the habitable zones of their stars, which means they might have liquid water on their surfaces. Currently we do not have the technology to determine if they actually have liquid water.
If by "Earth" you mean a planet that human beings would find very habitable (breathable atmosphere and not too hot or cold), I'd say one or maybe two. Look up "habitable zone" or "Goldilocks zone" for more information. There is some debate about the extent of a habitable zones.
Because planets are rather small on astronomical scales - or at least, when compared to stars, and not luminous like stars, it is very hard to see them at great distances. NASA's Kepler spacecraft, which was launched to detect planets within habitable zones of stars, detected in 2011 a couple planets orbiting a star roughly 1000 light years distance. The planets, designated Kepler 20e and 20f, are part of an unusual solar system, and are roughly Earth-sized and 'rocky' but orbiting their host star within the distance of Mercury to our Sun, which would make them too hot for life.
Well, there are no stars with no habitable zone or very inferior ones.
Not sure what you mean with "the same", but the habitable zone will presumably be closer to the star, or further away, depending on the star's total energy output.
Some probably can. A few have been discovered in the habitable zones around their stars, though there other factors in whether or not a planet can support life. Most, however, orbit too close or too far from their stars to support any form of life as we know it.
The tropical zones lie either side of the Equator and extend to near the temperate zone of south and north.
No. Some sources in the Media have been throwing around the term "Goldilocks" in reference to planets that orbit in the habitable zones of their respective stars, the region where a planet might be able to support liquid water (neither too hot nor too cold), which scientists generally think is necessary for life.
Swimming Zones is far more impressive than swimming stars but stars is good training
Temperate zones are either of the two intermediate latitude zones of the earth. Some countries on the temperate zones are Australia, France, the USA, China and New Zealand.
Oysters thrive in the tidal zones of sea or ocean water. There are intertidal and subtidal types of oysters, which both provide a habitable place for smaller sea animals to live within their hard shells.
There is no single planet named Kepler; rather Kepler is a prefix added to the designations of planets discovered by the Kepler telescope. Several planets discovered by Kepler, including Kepler-438b, Kepler-442b, Kepler 440b, and Kepler 296f, orbit in the habitable zones of their stars, which means they might have liquid water on their surfaces. Currently we do not have the technology to determine if they actually have liquid water.
There is no single planet named Kepler; rather Kepler is a prefix added to the designations of planets discovered by the Kepler telescope. Several planets discovered by Kepler, including Kepler-438b, Kepler-442b, Kepler 440b, and Kepler 296f, orbit in the habitable zones of their stars, which means they might have liquid water on their surfaces. Currently we do not have the technology to determine if they actually have liquid water.
The [related links] contain all the information you want. Habitable zones for each of the major stars in AUs.You could perhaps try calculating the limits of the Habitable zones for each of the stars in the Alpha Centauri system yourself, using the 'Habitable Zone Calculator,' which is based on findings from an up-to-date research paper.Using the calculator and taking temperature/luminosity values given in Wikipedia, these were the limits I got for Alpha Centauri A, B and Proxima for the minimum inner edge of the habitable zone (Runaway Greenhouse limit, 1 Earth mass, 1 atmosphere):1.2 AU, 0.71 AU, 0.044 AUAgain using the calculator, the limits I got for alpha Centauri A, B and Proxima for the maximum outer edge of the habitable zone (1 Earth mass, 8 carbon dioxide atmospheres) were:2.1 AU, 1.2 AU, 0.09 AUA more conservative measure of the maximum outer edge of the habitable zone, the '1st Condensation Limit', the distance from the star where the average temperature of the planet is cold enough for the carbon dioxide gas in the atmosphere to freeze out, is not a scenario included in the calculator. This is because the paper the calculator is based on assumes that after carbon dioxide freezes out and the planet glaciates there would be an inevitable build up of carbon dioxide; rocks deep under an increasingly glaciated planet would no longer be reacting with the atmosphere and so would not be removing carbon dioxide which is being pumped out all the time into the atmosphere from volcanoes, resulting in a warming feedback. However, a rough estimate of the 1st Condensation Limit for a 1 atmosphere planet around Alpha Centauri A, B and Proxima would be:1.65 AU, 1.0 AU, 0.07 AUIt's a shame the 'Habitable Zone Calculator' is so buggy and that the site that hosts the calculator doesn't offer an Excel version to download and work from.
It's difficult to know for sure but most studies lean towards statistics which hint on average there might be one planet per star - meaning there would be 200-400 billion planets in the Milky Way. The recent Kepler space mission data also indicate that there may be as many as 40 billion Earth-sized planets orbiting habitable zones of stars in the galaxy.