A lack of evidence would weaken any theory. But the well known asteroids have well defined orbits.
asti que vous etre touts des face de marde que pas capable de repondre as des asti question
It happened after Galileo published a book supporting the heliocentric theory that portrayed the Pope as a simpleton. The official view still supported the scriptural teaching that the Earth was at the centre. The church was unwilling to change its ideas until there was good evidence, which science did not have until the 18th century, so Galileo was taken to court, the lack of evidence was exposed and he recanted. The heliocentric theory, with the Sun at the centre, was eventually accepted when the evidence for it was discovered, which happened well after Galileo's lifetime.
Lack of evidence
As far as I understand, the evidence for black holes is quite firm; I don't think there is any problem.
I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.
Strengthens an argument: providing relevant evidence, logical reasoning, clear explanations, and counterarguments addressed effectively. Weakens an argument: lack of evidence or sources, logical fallacies, emotional manipulation, biased presentation of information, and inconsistencies in reasoning.
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
Plate tectonics is the combination of the seafloor spreading and continental drift. When Alfred Wegner described this process it was rejected due to lack of evidence. Since, we have discovered new evidence and proven his theory true.
lack of evidence lack of evidence
There is no lacking in the evidence of the assassination of JFK. There are many different conspiracy theories, but they are just theories. They all lack sufficient evidence for them to be credible.
The lack of gravity and exposure to artificial gravity severely weakens bones.
The hurricane weakens when it moves inland due to friction and lack of warm water.
For Lack of Evidence - 1917 was released on: USA: 17 April 1917
Lack of Evidence.
You mention, lack of evidence, and lack of witnesses. BUT - you don't mention the lack of a victim/complainant. You CAN be convicted on the testimony of victim alone.
There is no way. To win there's either lack of evidence, or little evidence. But if there is no evidence, there is case.
Lack of evidence that it needed to take place and disapproval from the U.N.