it is hard to find info about this question but poor farming isnt the right question
it is hard to find info about this question but poor farming isnt the right question
hi
I don’t know
The isolation of Sumerian city-states was largely due to the geographical barriers such as rivers, marshlands, and deserts that separated them. This made communication and trade between the city-states more challenging, leading to a sense of independence and distinct identity for each city-state. Additionally, competition for resources and power further contributed to their isolation as they sought to assert their dominance over neighboring city-states.
The Sumerian people built the first cities along the rivers with irrigation canals. Each Sumerian city became a city-state,independent of the others.
Pericles led the coalition of city-states known as the Delian League .
weak empire Mesopotamia had a weak empireReality:The fact that city-states are mentioned makes it plain that there was no empire - city-states are what they say - independent states based on a city, and so could not be an 'empire' which connotes centralised rule. And it was this independent status which led them to fighting between themselves. Mesopotamian civilisation was dependent on land and water. Disputed over them drove wars of possession.
The lack of money led to their decline.
The city of Sumer faced several weakening forces, including environmental challenges such as droughts and salinization of soil, which diminished agricultural productivity. Additionally, internal strife and competition among city-states led to political fragmentation and instability. External pressures from invading groups, such as the Akkadians and later the Babylonians, further eroded Sumer's power and influence, ultimately contributing to its decline. These combined factors resulted in the gradual downfall of Sumerian civilization.
The circumstances that led to the beginning of organized government began in ancient times. Organized governments were formed as a way to avoid anarchy.
The main difference between the Sumerians and Akkadians lies in their language and cultural identity. The Sumerians spoke a language isolate, known as Sumerian, and are credited with creating one of the earliest known civilizations in Mesopotamia, characterized by city-states like Ur and Uruk. In contrast, the Akkadians spoke a Semitic language and emerged later, unifying Sumerian city-states under the rule of Sargon of Akkad around 2334 BCE. This led to the establishment of the Akkadian Empire, which combined Sumerian and Akkadian cultures while promoting the Akkadian language.
weak empire Mesopotamia had a weak empireReality:The fact that city-states are mentioned makes it plain that there was no empire - city-states are what they say - independent states based on a city, and so could not be an 'empire' which connotes centralised rule. And it was this independent status which led them to fighting between themselves. Mesopotamian civilisation was dependent on land and water. Disputed over them drove wars of possession.