answersLogoWhite

0

l

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What did the Supreme Court declare in Miller v Johnson?

The supreme court declared that gerrymandering was unconstitutional because it violated the 14th amendment.


In 1993 the Supreme Court ruled that the practice of racial gerrymandering violated the?

The Supreme Court prohibited racial gerrymandering in 1993, holding that the practice violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.


How did the supreme court respond to gerrymandering?

The Supreme Court has addressed gerrymandering in various cases, notably in "Rucho v. Common Cause" (2019), where it ruled that partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of federal courts. The Court asserted that there are no judicial standards for evaluating partisan gerrymandering, thus leaving the issue primarily to state legislatures and voters to address. This decision effectively limited the ability of courts to intervene in cases of gerrymandering based on partisan lines, which has significant implications for electoral fairness.


Who limits federal electronic eavesdropping?

The U.S. Supreme Court.


What are the supreme court limits and restrictions?

njmhjhj


Who is responsible for appointing judges to the federal court?

The president appoints judges to the supreme court. But there are limits on how many, im not sure what those limits are.


What year Gerrymandering was outlawed by Wesberry v Sanders?

Wesberry v. Sanders was settled by the Supreme Court in 1964. It didn't outlaw Gerrymandering, it instituted the "one person, one vote" rule which forces all congressional districts have nearly the same population. Gerrymandering hasn't been outlawed.


What are the positive effect of gerrymandering?

There is nothing good about it. It makes sure that the election is rigged for a particular group to win. A case is before the Supreme Court now on this.


What are the age limits for a judge in the supreme court of India?

In India, there are no specific age limits set for judges of the Supreme Court. However, they are required to retire at the age of 65. To be appointed as a Supreme Court judge, a candidate must typically be a citizen of India and have served as a High Court judge for at least five years or have been an advocate of a High Court for at least ten years.


What Two limits are placed upon the powers of the supreme court?

opinions relating to legislation


What does this timeline show about the role of the Supreme Court in defining limits on free speech?

It shows that the Supreme Court can set new rules for free speech if the Court feels circumstances require it. -Apex 4.1.4


When does the US Supreme Court consider any form of gerrymandering unconstitutional?

There is a difference between redistricting and gerrymandering. Redistricting to keep voting fair and equitable is legal (although it may be challenged in court). Gerrymandering is drawing the voting districts in some way that increases or decreases the elective power of the votes cast in those districts. Gerrymandering was one way that the Northern Ireland Protestant Unionists kept power in the province when there were as many or more Roman Catholics in a given area. Gerrymandering is always unconstitutional since the Constitution guarantees equal rights to all.