Best Answer

The Supreme Court prohibited racial gerrymandering in 1993, holding that the practice violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The 14th Amendment

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In 1993 the Supreme Court ruled that the practice of racial gerrymandering violated the?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Related questions

Which term is defined as gerrymandering districts for the purpose of ensuring the minority representation?

Affirmative Racial Gerrymandering

Five instruments used to keep racial minorities from voting?

Grandfather clauses white primaries literacy tests gerrymandering

What important 1954 supreme court ruling banned racial segragation in public schools?

The important 1954 Supreme Court ruling that banned racial segregation in public schools was Brown v. Board of Education. The Court unanimously held that racial segregation of children in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This landmark decision challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).

How did the supreme court respond to the growth of racial segregation?

The Supreme Court at first said that it was the states' business and the federal government could not interfere. Later on, the Supreme Court made racial segregation illegal.

What are the five instruments used to keep racial minorities from voting or to lessen their vote?

Five instruments used historically to suppress voting among racial minorities include literacy tests, poll taxes, grandfather clauses, intimidation tactics, and gerrymandering. These methods were used to disenfranchise minority voters and limit their political power.

The practice of racial segregation in the South was based on the belief that?

some racial groups are superior to others

What is the policy to practice racial segregation and discrimination?


Will the US Supreme Court hear cases involving political questions?

The US Supreme Court believes "political questions" are appropriate issues for Congress, not the judiciary; however, they have ruled on certain cases regarding political redistricting (Baker v. Carr, (1962)) and racial gerrymandering (Shaw v. Reno, (1993), Miller v. Johnson, (1995)), where the legislature failed to address, or improperly addressed, issues that resulted in constitutional rights violations.

What is the practice of providing separate schools by racial groups?


What argument did plessy's legal term make in plessy v Ferguson?

In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, Plessy's legal team argued that Louisiana's Separate Car Act, which required racial segregation on trains, violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. They contended that the law denied Plessy equal protection under the law, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court rejected this argument and upheld the constitutionality of "separate but equal" racial segregation.

Any law that attempts a racial or ethnic classification is subject to the which test?

Any law that attempts a racial or ethnic classification is subject to the strict scrutiny test. This is to determine that there will be no Constitutional rights violated in the process of pursuing the interest.

Racial discrimination that results from practice rather than law is called?

Racial discrimination that results from practice rather than law is called de facto discrimination. De facto means in fact or in effect.