Strict scrutiny
age
The Supreme Court prohibited racial gerrymandering in 1993, holding that the practice violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
The Supreme Court has allowed the use of quotas under certain circumstances. For example, they ruled that racial quotas may continue at the University of Michigan.
the supreme court voids a new tax because it unconstitutionally targets religious minorities.
It declared that all racial groups were protected equally by the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Supreme Court at first said that it was the states' business and the federal government could not interfere. Later on, the Supreme Court made racial segregation illegal.
age
The Supreme Court prohibited racial gerrymandering in 1993, holding that the practice violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
It shows that the Supreme Court can set new rules for free speech if the Court feels circumstances require it. -Apex 4.1.4
1971
Brown v. Board
The Supreme Court case Brown vs. Board of Education was about racial segregation in public schools. The court cased declared this segregation unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court has allowed the use of quotas under certain circumstances. For example, they ruled that racial quotas may continue at the University of Michigan.
The ultimate answer lies with the Supreme Court.
The principle the court focused on was the principle of racial segregation.
The Supreme Court has allowed the use of quotas under certain circumstances. For example, they ruled that racial quotas may continue at the University of Michigan.
the supreme court voids a new tax because it unconstitutionally targets religious minorities.