answersLogoWhite

0

the form of transport was the main reason!

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How can visual search be made more successful for the observer?

A visual search can be made more successful for the observer by lessing the number of distractors.


What made PS more successful?

if your talking about the video game sistem , the 2nd PS made it more succsessful.


What historical event made Matilda's family business more successful?

no


How much more has Harry Potter made than Twilight?

Heaps. The least financially successful Harry Potter film made $90 million more than the most successful Twilight movie.


How did early people in mesopotamia make farming successful?

They made farming successful by building ditches and that would bring the water from the rivers to the village


Who were more successful Mormons or homesteaders?

It depends on what you term as successful, but I would say the Mormons, since they went into a more hostile environment and made a huge city that is still major today.


What are the three most successful movies ever made?

Click on the link below for more information.


What is the superlative of successful?

The superlative of successful is "most succesful."


What is the superlative form of successful?

more successful, most successful


What is the most successful video game made by EA Sports?

FIFA 14 was the most successful EA Sports video game ever made, selling more than 1.23 million copies in there first few days.


Do You think scientific management made business more successful?

yes cause it impove better life for middle class


Was Randolph Scott richest man in Hollywood?

Randolph Scott was not the richest man in Hollywood, although he was a successful actor and a prominent figure in Western films during his career. While he earned a substantial income and amassed considerable wealth, other figures in Hollywood, such as studio heads and producers, often had greater financial resources. Scott is more renowned for his contributions to cinema than for his wealth.