Roman soldiers were well-trained, well- disciplined, well- paid and well-armed. Roman generals also were very well educated in military tactics. In addition, Roman soldiers fought in groups of 100; each group had its own leader. If the Roman army lost a battle, the leaders of each group would line up their men and kill every tenth man. It is from this brutal but effective discipline that we get our word "decimate," to weaken or damage a group. So Roman soldiers had a strong incentive to do well!
In a nutshell, the Roman army had better leaders, better training , better weapons, which gave them confidence. They were also a professional army. This meant that they stayed in the army and trained for their enlistment period and were in general prepared for battle. Their enemies, on the other hand, would usually only fight for one battle and then disperse or fight for one fighting season and then go home. The Romans had the cohesion of a standing army while their enemies did not.
The Roman armies had discipline developed tactics that allowed them to out maneuver and overwhelm their enemies. They used their engineering skills to build siege engines to break down the walls of besieged cities. Romans developed weapons systems that were more advanced than any their enemies could employ (catapult's, crossbows, battering rams) and were able to equip and sustain their armies in the field through superior logistics and transportation. Most important, they learned from their opponents and incorporated improvements into their own tactical structure. Their main failure was a lack of truly strategic forethought, and how to best utilize and control their conquered territories.
you could send a whole legion of men to battle
The Roman army was so successful in executing their battle tactics due to their discipline. They held their ground in situations where the enemy would break and run. Training, discipline and the will to win were all ingredients in an army's victory.
Rome's government was so successful because the empire was so efficent. The Romans had paved roads and powerful armies to protect citizens too.
Bureaucracy.
they were made of bronze erlier but they were weak so then they were iron
Two highly successful empires from ancient times were the Egyptian empire and the Roman empire. Now you do the rest of your homework and figure out for yourself why they were successful.
because of who ruled it.
Being optimistic and real in his agenda made Pi's resilience so successful.
it was so successful because of how well it was made for how long ago it was created
They were highly disciplined, with intelligent and effective commanders, were issued good quality equipment, and were well trained in the use of their equipment and effective combat formations and manoeuvres. The Romans also made a point of learning as much as they could about their enemies prior to engaging them in combat so they could take advantages of the enemies weaknesses and take contingencies against their strengths.Of course this was not always the case, most of the major defeats of the Roman army can be traced to failures of one or more of these factors.
The majority of Roman apartments were made of wood, so making them firetraps.
The Roman army was so successful in executing their battle tactics due to their discipline. They held their ground in situations where the enemy would break and run. Training, discipline and the will to win were all ingredients in an army's victory.
Rome's government was so successful because the empire was so efficent. The Romans had paved roads and powerful armies to protect citizens too.
She was really bright!
He was charismatic and successful as a military leader.
Bulldog type determination and discipline made Teddy Roosevelt successful.
The fall of the pharoah
Slogans and jingles