A nucleus is stable if the electrostatic and strong nuclear forces balance out.
You can predict whether an isotope nucleus is likely to be stable by considering the ratio of protons to neutrons in the nucleus. Nuclei with a more balanced ratio of protons to neutrons tend to be more stable. Additionally, nuclei with magic numbers of protons or neutrons are also more likely to be stable.
No. In fact the largest stable nucleus of any atom in it's non isotope form is Lead at 82 protons
A stable nucleon is a particle found in the nucleus of an atom, either a proton or a neutron, that is not subject to radioactive decay. These particles are essential for the stability of the nucleus and play a crucial role in determining the properties of the atom.
There is a greater binding energy per nucleon. Greater binding energy signifies a more stable nucleus due to stronger bonds; in fission, the amount of electrons is irrelevant to stability.
When atoms have a balanced number of protons and neutrons, they are more likely to be stable. The nucleus of the atom is more stable when it has a balanced ratio of protons to neutrons, as this allows for a stronger nuclear force and reduces the likelihood of decay or instability.
It becomes most stable when its nucleus is filled, not when it is filling it.
The process of removing an electron from a stable nucleus is called electron capture. In this process, an electron is absorbed by a proton in the nucleus, converting the proton into a neutron and releasing a neutrino. This results in a more stable arrangement of particles in the nucleus.
A stable nucleus is one which will not decay, whereas an unstable nucleus will decay at some point, which cannot be predicted as decay is a random process, by alpha or beta decay.
You can predict whether an isotope nucleus is likely to be stable by considering the ratio of protons to neutrons in the nucleus. Nuclei with a more balanced ratio of protons to neutrons tend to be more stable. Additionally, nuclei with magic numbers of protons or neutrons are also more likely to be stable.
The atoms having 2 protons only in nucleus is not stable but 2 protons with 2 neutron in Helium nucleus are very stable.
By definition. If it were stable, then it would not be radioactive.
Being radioactive, uranium is not a stable element.
No. In fact the largest stable nucleus of any atom in it's non isotope form is Lead at 82 protons
The binding energy per nucleon is a measure of how tightly a nucleus is held together. Nuclei with higher binding energy per nucleon are more stable as they require more energy to break apart. Therefore, nuclei with a higher binding energy per nucleon are more stable and tend to resist undergoing nuclear reactions.
Change from unstable to stable nucleus.
Not very stable, that's for sure.
strong force