1. No one living in the pre-atomic world would fear a lone airplane. Only FLIGHTS of bombers were to be feared. (Pre-Atomic is Pre-August 6, 1945). 2. When listening to witnesses; always consider the source. Is the source reliable? What makes the source reliable? What makes the source UN-reliable? 3. Only someone present in the city of Hiroshima would know that warnings of an air raid were ignored. What mental and physical condition is the witness in, that has survived an atomic explosion? Consider the source of information.
Creates a guaranteed reliable source of food.
It was (farming) a more reliable and stable food source than hunting/gathering.
Historians will examine a second hand source of a historical event. If the second hand source matches up to other sources of information, then each source in a certain manner adds to the credibility of the historical event.
I don't know. Why don't you ask a reliable source?
created by an educated expert and published in an academic journal is not influenced by a bias
Reliable is an adjective, and source is a noun.
If you have a source don't be lazy and check at least two to three different sources and compare the given info. If the sources match, then the one you are asking about is reliable. If not it is not reliable. In cases like that just pick up a book. It doesn't hurt.
Reliable Source Music was created in 1997.
its a source
To determine if a book is a reliable source of information, you can check the author's credentials and expertise in the subject matter, evaluate the publisher's reputation for producing accurate and credible content, and review the sources the author used to support their claims within the book.
he was a reliable resource because he was at the battle of Thermopylae so he is a primerey source
It's not the most reliable source.
The internet is not the most reliable but sometimes the only source, as some information can only be found there.
its accuracy can be corroborated
No.
sunlight