0
What may be right for a person in one culture to do may not be right for a person in another culture to do. Can an ethical realist and a defender of ethical relativism agree on this?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which is proper approach of ethics ethical relativism and cultural relativism?
In ethics one must approach the situation from the ethical relativism point of view. Ethical relativism places the decision between right or wrong with the group of people affected.
How do you define and contrast relativism?
Relativism is the belief that truth and morality are not absolute, but are instead based on individual perspectives or cultural beliefs. In contrast, objectivism posits that there are objective truths and moral standards that are true regardless of personal or cultural viewpoints. Relativism allows for diverse beliefs and practices, while objectivism seeks to identify universal truths.
What is the difference between act utilitarianism and ethical relativism?
what is the fundamental difference between act utilitarianism and ethical relativism? is a good and bad discussion about the true of life
What is individual ethical relativism?
Individual ethical relativism is the belief that each person sets their own moral standards based on their own personal beliefs, experiences, and circumstances. This means that what is considered right or wrong can vary from person to person, depending on their individual perspective.
How do ethical relativism and cultural relativism and divine theory compare?
Ethical Relativism holds that ethics change when the situation changes. (I.e. while it might be wrong for an average person to commit theft, it would be acceptable for a starving person to steal to feed his family.) Cultural Relativism holds that due to culture and history being different in different regions, different truths are acceptable. Cultural Relativism stresses that different cultures have this sort of relationship. (I.e. Aztecs sacrificed humans and it's OK in their culture, but killing people in ours is a crime punishable by death.) Divine Theory is more Universalist in nature. According to Divine Theory, if you reject the Divine Law, you are performing wrong actions regardless of whether or not you concede the validity of the Divine Theory. This means that upbringing and culture are no excuse to avoiding the Universalist Code of Ethics. (The thief in the Ethical Relativism case would still be doing wrong.)
What is the link between ethical relativism and religion?
spirituality and peace of mind.
What is cultural relativism?
Judging a person's actions based on his or her cultural context
What are the types of ethical judgment and ethical reasoning?
There are different types of ethical judgments and ethical reasoning's that are based on beliefs/ Egoism, justice, deontology, and relativism are different points of view.
What is the difference between moral relativism and ethical relativism?
Ethical relativism denies universal moral principles, claiming that moral codes are strictly subjective. Ethical situationalism states moral principles are objective, and should be applied differently in different contexts.
Relativism is a subset of the following ethical system?
Freedom-based ethics
If Mr. Swanson a college professor says that there is no such thing as right and wrong and treats questions regarding what is good and evil as relative to an individual's values and culture this is?
This could be called either ethical nihilism or ethical relativism depending on the degree of subjectivity. Note: this has nothing to do with the Theory of Relativity in physics.
What three problems afflict traditional relativism for ayer?
Ayer stated that the 3 problems that afflict traditional relativism are 1 moral or ethical judgement 2 obligation 3 disagreement.
