Egypt would probably have been destroyed earlier.
Egypt would probably have been destroyed earlier.
he will be destroyed
he will be destroyed
Egypt would probably have been destroyed earlier.
People would have been driven out of egypt. The answer was just a prediction.
People would have been driven out of egypt. The answer was just a prediction.
People would have been driven out of egypt. The answer was just a prediction.
not right now but coming up soon there will be new weapons i don't know if dual cutlasses will be there but it might happen!
A person who studies ancient weapons might be a military historian, or might be an archaeologist. There is more than one reason to study ancient weapons.
Without this right, it might be made illegal for private citizens to own weapons. If the private citizens had no weapons, it would be easier for criminals to take advantage of law-abiding people. It would also be easier for the military to take over the country and much harder to overthrow an illegal government.
they do everything you might do !!
If Kush had redeveloped iron weapons, it could have significantly shifted the balance of power in the region. Enhanced military capabilities might have allowed Kush to expand its influence over Egypt, potentially leading to conflicts or even a takeover. This technological advancement could also have spurred economic growth through increased trade in iron goods, altering the dynamics of regional trade networks. Moreover, the strengthened military might of Kush could have encouraged other neighboring states to adapt or innovate their own weaponry in response.