Without this right, it might be made illegal for private citizens to own weapons. If the private citizens had no weapons, it would be easier for criminals to take advantage of law-abiding people. It would also be easier for the military to take over the country and much harder to overthrow an illegal government.
yes they can take your right to bear arms
The right to speak your mind without the government harrassing you because of what you say.
Bear arms hold bear paws to bear torsos. The right to BARE ARMS, on the other hand, is the right to have a weapon (also called a firearm).
The Second Amendment is there to protect our right listed in the first Amendment.
Nothing forced him silly he was born without arms and legs if you look him up there is a picture of him at only six months old without any arms or legs and just that small'foot' he has on his left ...'leg'
in what situation might it be better to position the electrodes on the upper arms and thighs rather than lower on the arms and legs
That would be the 2nd amendment.
The right to keep and bear arms, because without it you can't protect the others!
The second amendment allows you the right to beat arms. Guns do not kill people, but idiots with guns kill people. People do not think before they act and bad things can happen this way.
although an octopus has eight arms or tantacles
although an octopus has eight arms or tantacles
Wild Arms happened in 1996.
Thousand Arms happened in 1998.
Enchanted Arms happened in 360.
Wing Arms happened in 1995.
Coded Arms happened in 2005.
"Non sans droict" meaning "Not without right."