whether the data supports the hypothesis
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis.
the variables and the facts so you don't make any mistakes about the conclusion.
my hypothesis was correct or my hypothesis was incorrect
Ask yourself if you collected enough data and if your data supported your hypothesis.
When you are making a conclusion in an experiment you will want to consider all of the findings in your experiment and use them to make the right conclusion.
You might ask yourself what did I learn from this test and how
Do you have a question
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis
No... scientific inquiry begins by coming up with a question. From there you develop a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, alter your hypothesis if need be, test again, etc. Only after you have data that supports your hypothesis (if it ever does) do you draw any conclusions. If your data consistently does not support your hypothesis, no matter how it is modified, you may draw conclusions about your basic contentions as well. YES BUT..... what should you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion about an experiment?
Is the information your reviewing provided or your own? Does the appearance support the hypothesis or the evidence? Ever heard of devils advocat?
Did you prove or disprove your hypothesis? This is the first question to ask when evaluating an experiment.
whether the data supports the hypothesis
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis.
You might ask yourself what did I learn from this test and how
Do you have a question
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis.
you need to ask ----> Does my conclusion support my hypothesis?
whether the data supports the hypothesis
I.What types of plants were used in the experiment?II.What was the experiment's control? III.Was the experiment repeated more than once?
No... scientific inquiry begins by coming up with a question. From there you develop a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, alter your hypothesis if need be, test again, etc. Only after you have data that supports your hypothesis (if it ever does) do you draw any conclusions. If your data consistently does not support your hypothesis, no matter how it is modified, you may draw conclusions about your basic contentions as well. YES BUT..... what should you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion about an experiment?
Is the information your reviewing provided or your own? Does the appearance support the hypothesis or the evidence? Ever heard of devils advocat?