Is the information your reviewing provided or your own? Does the appearance support the hypothesis or the evidence? Ever heard of devils advocat?
if the evidece suported your hypothises
Do you have a question
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis
You might ask yourself what did I learn from this test and how
whether the data supports the hypothesis
No... scientific inquiry begins by coming up with a question. From there you develop a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, alter your hypothesis if need be, test again, etc. Only after you have data that supports your hypothesis (if it ever does) do you draw any conclusions. If your data consistently does not support your hypothesis, no matter how it is modified, you may draw conclusions about your basic contentions as well. YES BUT..... what should you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion about an experiment?
Do you have a question
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis.
whether the data supports the hypothesis
you need to ask ----> Does my conclusion support my hypothesis?
Did you prove or disprove your hypothesis? This is the first question to ask when evaluating an experiment.
You might ask yourself what did I learn from this test and how
whether the data supports the hypothesis
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis.
whether the data supports the hypothesis
Are the loose ends tied up, or are there unresolved questions.
No... scientific inquiry begins by coming up with a question. From there you develop a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, alter your hypothesis if need be, test again, etc. Only after you have data that supports your hypothesis (if it ever does) do you draw any conclusions. If your data consistently does not support your hypothesis, no matter how it is modified, you may draw conclusions about your basic contentions as well. YES BUT..... what should you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion about an experiment?