During the early centuries of Christianity many extravagant miracles have been credited to various of the early apostles, but few if any have been attributed to Luke.
St. Luke is not traditionally associated with performing miracles during his lifetime. He is known as a physician, writer of the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles, and a companion of St. Paul in his missionary journeys.
Wrote two books of the New Testament, namely Luke and Acts, both of which demonstrate his attention to both detail and accuracy, many details, including those previously thought to be wrong, having been verified by archaeological discoveries as having been correct. In the Gospel which bears his name there are many details which are not mentioned elsewhere. His style, unlike say that of Mark, demonstrates scholarly ability.
Luke is known to have accompanied Paul on some of his missionary journeys, as he uses the first person 'we' when referring to some of the events in which he participated.
Saint Luke's occupation was helping people with injuries and illness and was the doctor of Judia.
St. Luke is thought to have been a physician.
The work of Luke in The Bible ,is that he was a doctor.
Luke is mentioned by Paul (or, more probably, pseudo-Paul) as a physician and travelling companion who helped evangelise the Gentiles. Many Christians believe that this is the same person who wrote the Gospel According to Saint Luke. However, We do not really know who wrote the Gospel. From as early as we have anything like a title for it, the title was given with the Greek phrase "Gospel according to...", using kata, which ordinarily means that the contents of the books were not written by the person named, but that the person named was used as the source. The use of "kata" means the authorship was assigned later, meaning the Gospels were originally unsigned. Thus the author we now know as Luke was different from the Luke known to Paul. He even said (Luke 1:1) that he was writing about those things that were believed, not those things that he knew first hand or from actual witnesses. So:
Miracles were not required in the earlier years of the Church before the canonization process was established in the 12th century.
Luke wrote one of the four canonical Gospels as well as the Acts of the Apostles.
st. LUKE was a physician .
Jesus performed 19 miracles in Luke.
If St. George performed any miracles, there is no record of them.
yes
There is nothing in either scripture or tradition to answer that question.
We have no record of any miracles performed by St. Monica. What's more, saints do not 'perform' miracles. Saints act as a channel for God to work miracles.
Barnabas was evidently not remembered for any miracles as I find nothing recorded in any biography of the saint.
St. Benedict of Nursia is known to have had a sister named St. Scholastica. He is associated with performing miracles, including healing the sick and driving out demons. Both siblings are considered important figures in the development of Western monasticism.
I can find no saint by that name. Check your spelling.
book of luke
St. Valentine did not perform any miracles. There is little information known about him other than he existed and his feast day is February 14th.
The three miracles of Saint Clelia Barbieri are as follows. First, she had the gift of prophecy. Secondly, her prayers to St. Francis were answered in the form of food, and lastly, her voice is still heard in the chapel where she lived.
Yes, St. Rose Philippine Duchesne is known for performing miracles. Some accounts include healing the sick, multiplying food during times of scarcity, and appearing in multiple places at once. These miracles have been attributed to her intercession and devotion to God.