alchemy
no FMA doesn't share the same world because in chrono crusade it is more about demons, angels, and religion, were fullmetal alchemist is more scientific in a way So nope!(correct me if I'm wrong)
Absolutely not!!!!!! --- no but some of the episodes are based off one another
i heard that full metal alchemist season 1 was made by Americans then the actual creator of full metal alchemist came out with brotherhood. so there not exactly the same or finish eachother but some parts are the same as the 1st season.
All modern horses carry the same scientific name Equus caballus.
Full Metal Alchemist Brotherhood is basicly the same thing as Full Metal Alchemist but Fma Brotherhood follows the plot of the manga more that Fma. So Fma Brotherhood is NOT a continuation of Fma.
Edward Elric- transformation and scientific breakdown alchemy Alphonse Elric -same as Edwards Roy Mustang- Flame alchemy Louis Armstrong- Rock and Strength alchemy Izumi Curtis- Same as Elric Brothers Tim Marcoh- Crystal alchemist, creator of small philosopher stone fragments Solf Kimblee- Explosions
In Fullmetal Alchemist, Envy shows up in episode 2 to impersonate Cornello. In Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood, Envy shows up in episode 3 for the same reason.
The creator is Hiromu Arakawa who wrote and illustrated Fullmetal Alchemist herself. The manga was then adapted by Bones into an animated series titled the same as the manga, Fullmetal Alchemist that consist of 51 episodes. Another series, a remake of the first series was then aired with the title Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood.
Absolutely not. Chrono Trigger and Fullmetal Alchemist have different creators. Chrono Trigger also has monsters, magicians, as well as a political system that differs from Fullmetal Alchemist. Fullmetal Alchemist on the other hand does not have monsters that frequently (and commonly) roam around, nor do they have magic users.
14. Same as in the origial series because the starts are the same.
Both words derive from the same word root, but 'definition' is a noun, and 'to define' is a verb.
No, but both stories ultimately derive from versions of the same underlying mythologies.