Want this question answered?
Generally, it means that a plaintiff does not have to show actual damages before having a viable lawsuit. For example, in slander and libel law, before a slander suit can win damages there must be proof that the person slandered suffered some type of harm like loss of prestige in the community or loss of business. However, some slanders, like saying a particular person is a convicted criminal, are actionable per se, meaning that the plainitff does not have to prove loss of prestige in the community. The law presumes that a false statement that some person is a criminal necessarilly causes damage. A jury would be permitted to award damages without the plaintiff proving that any were actually suffered.
The word plaintiff is the instigating party in a civil suit, a person or corporate entity. There is only the possessive adjective (paintiff's or plaintiffs') and no adverb form.
A plaintiffs role is one who brings a case to court
The civil suit resulted in the defendant having to pay compensatory damages to the victim.
You could file suit, but you probably wouldn't win or recover anything. Serving molded bread is not a cause of action, and you'd be hard pressed to prove that you suffered any damages.
Dereliction of a duty directly causing damages. A defendant does not have to prove or disprove anything. The plaintiff carries the burden of having to prove all required elements of any action. If four elements are required and the plaintiff can only prove three, then the plaintiff loses. As with the people wishing to sue for finding hair in their french fries, if you lack damages or injuries, you lose. If you are injured, but the defendant is not the one who injured you, then you lose. You cannot win a negligence suit if you are missing one of the required elements of your case.
Yes, they can be sued, but the suit will not be successful. (In the US, anyone can sue anyone for anything at any time. The question is not whether they can sue, but whether they can win. The type of lawsuit you are asking about is a libel or slander suit (oral or written). In order to prove this kind of suit, the plaintiff (here the celebrity) must assert that the defendant said something that is false about the plaintiff, and that the allegations led to damages for the plaintiff. Further, public figures, such as celebrities and politicians must also prove that the allegations were made with malice. A celebrity would not be able to prove that they suffered actual damages from being called ugly. However, there are successful libel/slander lawsuits. For example, if I told your employer that I caught you in bed with my 5 year old daughter, they believed it, and fired you as a result, you would be able to win this type of lawsuit.
One who seek the justice.Another View: The plaintiff is the person who initiates a court action by filing a complaint with the clerk of the court against a defendant and demanding damages, performance, and/or a court determination of their rights.A plaintiff is sometimes called a petitioner.THey are the party who initiates the court action.
The Plaintiff.
The standard remedy is money. That is why one must be able to show damages to bring a tort suit. Without damages, there is nothing to bring suit for.
a plaintiff
Action in form of a judgment taken against a plaintiff who has failed to appear to prosecute his action or failed to prove his case,
The person initiating a law suit is called an Appellant.
You can file a counter suit or sue for damages. You should consult with an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.You can file a counter suit or sue for damages. You should consult with an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.You can file a counter suit or sue for damages. You should consult with an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.You can file a counter suit or sue for damages. You should consult with an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.
Typically, before a plaintiff files suit, he sends a demand letter to the defendant outlining the injury and requesting a specific amount of damages be paid to avoid filing a lawsuit. If the defendant's insurance company is responsible, a copy of this letter would also be sent to this insurance company.
The defense does not need to prove anything. The defense merely needs to cause doubt on one of the elements to win. For example, in a negligence suit, the plaintiff must prove. 1. duty 2. breach of duty 3. actual causation 4. proximate causation 5. damages. The defense only needs to create some doubt with regard to one of these elements. There is one exception though. The defense can also try to prove an "affirmative defense". If I am suing you for punching me in the face, you can try to prove that we were in a fight club and that I asked you to punch me in the face. As for my source, I am a law student, not a lawyer, so check with a lawyer if you are having legal trouble.
The plaintiff is the person who brings or files suit and the defendant is the person who is sued by the plaintiff.