0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why is creationism not usually regarded as a scientific theory today?
For a model to be scientific, it must adhere to scientific principles. - It must have explanatory power: it must show how the hypothesized mechanisms logically yield the observations claimed to support the hypothesis. - The above requirement also automatically leads to an additional requirement: the model must yield predictions about future observations. For instance, if what we know about gravity is correct, then one would expect future observations to reflect predictable behaviour. Any observation inconsistent with such predictions would lead to rejection or revision of the model. - It must be consistent with known scientific laws: for instance, any model that violates the law of conservation of energy would automatically be suspect. - It must be falsifiable: there must be the hypothetical possibility of observations that would, if they were made, cause the model to be rejected or at least revised. - The observations that support the hypothesis must be repeatable and independently verifiable. For instance, a morphological assay of fossil forms based on the same dataset performed by independent scientists must be capable of yielding the same phylogenetic tree. - It must be parsimonious: the model should depend on as few unsupportable assumptions as necessary to match the above requirements. Creationism violates at least some and possibly all of the above requirements, and can therefore not be regarded a scientific model.
Under what conditions can a scientific model or theory change?
A scientific model can change if new evidence is found. If the new evidence that has been found contradicts the model or theory then a scientific model or theory can change.
What must happen for scientific theories to be accepted as valid?
One of the conditions that must be satisfied is that it must match the evidence that is provided. Next it should be able to predict things. Lastly, it's statement must be able to be verified independently.
What characteristics must a hypothesis have to be considered scientific?
To make your hypothesis considered scientific it must have testable and measurable results. Example: If you do an experiment and the results are testable and measurable another person would be able to do the exact same project and come out with the same results.
What are the characteristics of a scientific model?
simplicty
How does a scientific model differ from a model airplane or boat that you might build?
There is a significant difference between a scientific model, and a model aeroplane etc. A model aeroplane demostrates the reaction of that particular object in a set situation, or environment. A scientofic model must be able to explain why that particular action takes place.
A scientific hypothesis must be?
repeatedly confirmed by experimentation.
What is a model and what are two things a model must do?
A model is a visual or mathematical representation used to develop scientific explanations. It must conform to known experimental results and predict future experiment results accurately.
What does it mean when we say a scientific question must be repeated?
When we say a scientific question must be repeatable, it simply means that several scientist must be able to do a test and all of them come with the same result.
What does it mean when you say a scientific question must be repeatable?
. Other scientists must be able to repeat the test and get the same results.
What conditions must be satisfied for a scientific theory to be valid?
One of the conditions that must be satisfied is that it must match the evidence that is provided. Next it should be able to predict things. Lastly, it's statement must be able to be verified independently.
Is a map a scientific model?
Yes a map is a scientific model
Why is creationism not usually regarded as a scientific theory today?
For a model to be scientific, it must adhere to scientific principles. - It must have explanatory power: it must show how the hypothesized mechanisms logically yield the observations claimed to support the hypothesis. - The above requirement also automatically leads to an additional requirement: the model must yield predictions about future observations. For instance, if what we know about gravity is correct, then one would expect future observations to reflect predictable behaviour. Any observation inconsistent with such predictions would lead to rejection or revision of the model. - It must be consistent with known scientific laws: for instance, any model that violates the law of conservation of energy would automatically be suspect. - It must be falsifiable: there must be the hypothetical possibility of observations that would, if they were made, cause the model to be rejected or at least revised. - The observations that support the hypothesis must be repeatable and independently verifiable. For instance, a morphological assay of fossil forms based on the same dataset performed by independent scientists must be capable of yielding the same phylogenetic tree. - It must be parsimonious: the model should depend on as few unsupportable assumptions as necessary to match the above requirements. Creationism violates at least some and possibly all of the above requirements, and can therefore not be regarded a scientific model.
Is a scientific theory a model?
Scientific theory is not a model but the model can be construct to represent how any scientific theory work. Model of a large system e.g. earth's climate would contain many scientific theory of different field to make it work.
Under what conditions can a scientific model or theory change?
A scientific model can change if new evidence is found. If the new evidence that has been found contradicts the model or theory then a scientific model or theory can change.
What must a hypothesis have to be considered scientific?
To make your hypothesis considered scientific it must have testable and measurable results. Example: If you do an experiment and the results are testable and measurable another person would be able to do the exact same project and come out with the same results.
A hypothesis must be considered what to be scientific?
To make your hypothesis considered scientific it must have testable and measurable results. Example: If you do an experiment and the results are testable and measurable another person would be able to do the exact same project and come out with the same results.
