0
What else can I help you with?
Is it true that A scientific theory is a statement that describes what scientists expect to happen every time under certain conditions?
A scientific theory presents an explanation for a phenomenon. Using that explanation, one can then make predictions about what will happen under certain conditions. But the prediction is not the theory, it is a implication of the theory.
What is the difference between a scientific theory and scientific law?
Scientific theory is a well supported by evidence set of principles that explain and predict natural phenomenon. A scientific law explains what some phenomenon does scientifically and under the same conditions.
What is what scientist expect to happen every time under a particular set of conditions?
If all conditions are the same, then the same results will occur. (Objective reality is deterministic.) If a scientific theory predicts a certain result but it does not occur always, then the theory is incomplete or incorrect (or both).
What examples can you find to show evidence scientific theory and scientific law?
Scientific theory and scientific law differ in their nature and function within science. For example, the theory of evolution by natural selection explains the mechanisms of biological change over time but does not prescribe a definitive outcome. In contrast, Newton's law of universal gravitation describes the predictable behavior of gravitational forces between masses, consistently applying under specific conditions. While theories offer explanations for phenomena, laws summarize observed patterns without delving into underlying mechanisms.
What is the difference between scientific law and sccientific theory?
A law is a pattern of phenomena that are always found under specified conditions (i.e. something that always happens), while a theory is a well-supported and generally accepted statement explaining a series of observations. Sometimes a theory can lead to a law, such as Newtonian gravitation.
Is it true that A scientific theory is a statement that describes what scientists expect to happen every time under certain conditions?
A scientific theory presents an explanation for a phenomenon. Using that explanation, one can then make predictions about what will happen under certain conditions. But the prediction is not the theory, it is a implication of the theory.
What is the difference between a scientific theory and scientific law?
Scientific theory is a well supported by evidence set of principles that explain and predict natural phenomenon. A scientific law explains what some phenomenon does scientifically and under the same conditions.
What is the difference between a scientific theory and scientific laws?
Scientific theory is a well supported by evidence set of principles that explain and predict natural phenomenon. A scientific law explains what some phenomenon does scientifically and under the same conditions.
What the difference between a scientific theory and a scientific law?
Scientific theory is a well supported by evidence set of principles that explain and predict natural phenomenon. A scientific law explains what some phenomenon does scientifically and under the same conditions.
Can a scientific theory become a scientific law?
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
What is the the difference between a scientific hypothesis and a scientific theory?
A scientific hypothesis is an educated guess of what will happen in the experiment. A scientific theory is someone's thoughts on why something happened in an experiment. However, this cannot be proven. The opposite of this is a scientific law. This is statement of what will always happen under the same conditions.
Are scientific theory and a scientific law are essentially the same thing true or false?
False. A scientific theory and a scientific law are not the same thing. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world, based on extensive evidence and experimentation, while a scientific law is a statement that describes a consistent and observable phenomenon, often expressed mathematically. Theories can evolve and change with new evidence, whereas laws are generally accepted as universally applicable under specific conditions.
How scientific theories differ from scientific law?
A scientific law is a statement that describes what scientists expect to happen every time under a particular set of conditions. Unlike a theory, a scientific law describes an observed pattern without attempting to explain it.
How do scientific theories differ froms scientific laws?
A scientific law is a statement that describes what scientists expect to happen every time under a particular set of conditions. Unlike a theory, a scientific law describes an observed pattern without attempting to explain it.
What is what scientist expect to happen every time under a particular set of conditions?
If all conditions are the same, then the same results will occur. (Objective reality is deterministic.) If a scientific theory predicts a certain result but it does not occur always, then the theory is incomplete or incorrect (or both).
What examples can you find to show evidence scientific theory and scientific law?
Scientific theory and scientific law differ in their nature and function within science. For example, the theory of evolution by natural selection explains the mechanisms of biological change over time but does not prescribe a definitive outcome. In contrast, Newton's law of universal gravitation describes the predictable behavior of gravitational forces between masses, consistently applying under specific conditions. While theories offer explanations for phenomena, laws summarize observed patterns without delving into underlying mechanisms.
Procedure adopted under the scientific method in development under the economic theory?
Describe the procedure adopted under the scientific method in the development of economic theories
