lawyer
snakaester can suck it!
lawyers and businesspeople lawyers and businesspeople
Yes it does. The US Constitution prescribes that the Congress assemble on 3 January, prior to the 20 January Inaugural.
A closed meeting of each political party in each house of congress is known as a caucus. Caucuses take place each year prior to Congress convening.
The first nomination conventions were held in 1832 and both parties met in Baltimore. Prior to that members of Congress met and nominated someone from their party.
ballsacks
He was a lawyer
He was in the legal profesion.
Mancala was played in Africa but there is no documentation to show that the game made it to Europe prior to the British occupations in Africa.
Prior to (and during) the gay marriage movement, which began in full force after 2000, many people in Congress believed that gay people could form private legal contracts and get the same benefits of marriage, which was not true.
No; there is no actual requirement under either Congressional rules in either chamber of Congress or Constitutional provision that states that a member of Congress must read the whole of a bill being voted upon prior to being eligible to vote. In fact, one subverssive, but nonetheless legal strategy used for passage of particularly unpopular bills is to make it almost impossible for them to be read prior to being voted on, i.e. the current national healthcare bill - H.R. 3200 - being proposed by Mr. Obama and Democratic members of Congress, which is 1070 pages long, or any number of ridiculously long tax bills. The idea is that the bill will be so long that members of Congress will not only not want to read it, but not have sufficient time to read and analyze the entire bill. Luckily, with their army of assistants and congressional aides, not to mention the litany of interest groups that exist for literally any possible agenda item that might come through Congress, the individual congressional members don't necessarily even need to read the entire bills, and can instead trust that watch dog groups, their aides, lobbys, etc. will do the digging and heavy lifting for them. Then all they have to do is vote, based on the different facts and arguments presented to them by different groups vying for their vote, and in the end vote with what is ultimately in line with their constituancy - in other words, what will get them reelected. Yes, especially if those bills contain taxes. Because otherwise it is considered taxation without representation. Their job dictates them to represent the people which cannot happen if they don't properly read the bill. I haven't memorized the entire constitution but I'm fairly sure what I said is expressed in it.
The Federalist Papers