well.....my dick
Court ruled that Georgia was not entitled to regulate the Cherokee nor to invade their lands.
In response to the Supreme Court's ruling in Worcester v Georgia that Georgia had no right to interfere with the Cherokee, President Jackson disregarded the decision and removal of the Cherokee proceeded as planned.
Yes he did
Court ruled that Georgia was not entitled to regulate the Cherokee nor to invade their lands.
defiant.
Worcester V. Georgia (1832)
Worcester v. Georgia (1832)
Yes, the case was heard under the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction. Worcester v. Georgia, (1832) was appealed on a writ of error from the Superior Court for the County of Gwinett in the State of Georgia.Case Citation:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)
The Cherokees', for the first time got what they wanted.
The US Supreme Court heard Worcester v. Georgia in 1832.In Worcester, the US Supreme Court decided the states (in this case, Georgia) had no right to redraw the boundaries of Native American territories, or to require white people to purchase a license to live on the land. As a result, the lower court decision convicting eleven missionaries of violating state law by refusing to purchase a permit to live on Cherokee land was reversed.The seven-member Supreme Court, lead by Chief Justice John Marshall, voted 6-1 on March 3, 1832, to overturn the missionaries' convictions.Case Citation:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)For more information on Worcester v. Georgia, see Related Questions, below.
Jackson ignored Worcester v. Georgia. This was significant because Andrew Jackson ignored the Supreme Court's decision which said that Georgia couldn't make laws that broke the terms on the authority of which the Cherokee's have the right to govern themselves on. Many people ask can he ignore the Supreme Court? Or, Why didn't the Supreme Court do anything about it? And do you know what I would say. idk. :)