Want this question answered?
by taking these two lifeforms away you will starve the other lifeforms and they will eventually be extinct.
because a food source can become extinct and if the other organisms only food source becomes extinct the species would starve and become extinct and other species will become extinct as well.
Since producers are typically at the bottom of the food chain (unless its a venus fly trap, which produces and is a tier 2 consumer--i think) all other organisms depend on them. If all the phytoplankton in a lake dies, for example, the zooplankton will starve, the minnows that eat the zooplankton will starve, the largemouth bass that eat the minnows will starve, and eventually the giant muskellunge that eats bass will starve too, leaving the lake barren and empty. If the producers survive, everything survives, and vice versa, to put it simply.
They starve to death.
It kills all organic organisms so the flood starve and die
starve
Most likely because if the one item they eat gets extinct, then most likely, they will starve to death.
If pikas go extinct, there will be TOO much of a plant and also the animals that feed on pikas will starve and then every animal will go extinct by starvation. I have no idea what more can happen! Please answer! I am also researching in this topic.
birds small mamals and some reptiles would go up and numbers causing less other types of owls to starve, meaning more sucses for other owls species.
It's never good to remove an apex predator from an environment. Bears have their place, like removing the sick and weak animals from the population, so they won't breed and maybe pass on the sickly genes to their offspring.
He jumped from great heights and tried to starve himself.
STARVE - SUN OF A STARVE's mini album was created on 2012-02-22.