Want this question answered?
It would be wasted,if you are smart you would know that the opposite of useful is un useful
I would ask him why he rejects certain experiments on light that go in circles.
they wouldnt
You could use plastic, rubber, wood and several other things/ Plastic and rubber are much preferred, though.
Some of Einstein's experiments were called thought experiments. So he thought about what would happen under unusual circumstances, like a train speeding up to a velocity near the speed of light.
In WWII an airplane would be useful to bomb the other countries.
If people used experiments on each other, there would be a lot more deaths on innocent people.
People who would find periscopes useful are those who would wish to spy on other people.:-)
These measurements are the result of experiments or are derived from other physical data.
no because of the board of ethics in the US today does not allow for these kind of experiments to be performed. European countries on the other hand may allow for such experiments.
Color and streak would be the least useful, because they may be shared by a multitude of other minerals.
Why would they create programs if it won't even be useful for themselves...Ofcourse they should create programs that are useful to themselves and other people..that's why programming is invented for advantages....
With controlled experiments it is taken into consideration what possible variables there could be and it is taken into account when conducting the experiment. This would mean that controlled experiments would produce more valid data.
Color and streak would be the least useful, because they may be shared by a multitude of other minerals.
no it would be dangeras
Then constantly, experiments and tests would produce "un-accurate" answers, because of the other foreign microbes on their equipment.
Exceedingly. Other than that you would just use leaves or your hands!!