answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The province of Lusitania, or present day Portugal, was the westernmost province of ancient Rome.

The province of Lusitania, or present day Portugal, was the westernmost province of ancient Rome.

The province of Lusitania, or present day Portugal, was the westernmost province of ancient Rome.

The province of Lusitania, or present day Portugal, was the westernmost province of ancient Rome.

The province of Lusitania, or present day Portugal, was the westernmost province of ancient Rome.

The province of Lusitania, or present day Portugal, was the westernmost province of ancient Rome.

The province of Lusitania, or present day Portugal, was the westernmost province of ancient Rome.

The province of Lusitania, or present day Portugal, was the westernmost province of ancient Rome.

The province of Lusitania, or present day Portugal, was the westernmost province of ancient Rome.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The province of Lusitania, or present day Portugal, was the westernmost province of ancient Rome.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The territory of Lusitania, today's Portugal, was about the farthest west.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What part of the roman empire was farthest west?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

Which country under roman rule was farthest west?

The Roman Empire at is peak reach as far north as British isles. The western border was modern turkey and as far east as Spain.


What empire was originally part of the roman empire?

There was no empire which was originally part of the Roman Empire. It could look like the Byzantine Empire was originally part of the Roman Empire, but it was not. It was always the Roman Empire. Byzantine Empire is a term coined by historians to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire in 476. The Romans themselves did not use this term. They just had the term Roman Empire. The eastern part of the Roman Empire continued to exist for another 1,000 years after the fall of the western part. The term Byzantine is derived from Byzantium, the name of the Greek city which was redeveloped, turned into the capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and renamed Constantinople by Constantine the Great in 330. It is used to indicate the fact that not long after the fall of the west, this empire became centred on Greece and Greek in character after it lost most of its non-Greek territories. Greek replaced Latin as the official language of this empire in 620, some 150 years after the fall of the west.


When did the roman empire in the west end?

The Roman Empire in the west ended in 476 AD, when the last Roman emperor, Romulus Augustus, was deposed by the Germanic king Odoacer. Odoacer then became the ruler of Italy and marked the end of the Western Roman Empire.


What was the furthest point west the Romans sailed?

The westernmost part of the Roman Empire was Portugal.


What was the size of the roman empire from east to west?

The roman empire extended for about 4500 miles from west to east.

Related questions

Which country under roman rule was farthest west?

The Roman Empire at is peak reach as far north as British isles. The western border was modern turkey and as far east as Spain.


When did Greece stop being part of the roman empire?

In 395 the Roman empire split into two pieces: the west and the east. Rome and Italy were part of the west and Greece was part of the east.


Was Germany ever part of the Roman Empire?

The areas to the west of the Rhine, the south of the Danube and some adjecent areas were in the Roman Empire.


What empire was originally part of the roman empire?

There was no empire which was originally part of the Roman Empire. It could look like the Byzantine Empire was originally part of the Roman Empire, but it was not. It was always the Roman Empire. Byzantine Empire is a term coined by historians to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire in 476. The Romans themselves did not use this term. They just had the term Roman Empire. The eastern part of the Roman Empire continued to exist for another 1,000 years after the fall of the western part. The term Byzantine is derived from Byzantium, the name of the Greek city which was redeveloped, turned into the capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and renamed Constantinople by Constantine the Great in 330. It is used to indicate the fact that not long after the fall of the west, this empire became centred on Greece and Greek in character after it lost most of its non-Greek territories. Greek replaced Latin as the official language of this empire in 620, some 150 years after the fall of the west.


When did the roman empire in the west end?

The Roman Empire in the west ended in 476 AD, when the last Roman emperor, Romulus Augustus, was deposed by the Germanic king Odoacer. Odoacer then became the ruler of Italy and marked the end of the Western Roman Empire.


Who is considered the founder of the Eastern Roman Empire?

There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.


Which city of the Persian Empire appears to be farthest west.?

Cyrene.


What is the farthest west that Justinian was able to strech his empire?

Spain


What was the furthest point west the Romans sailed?

The westernmost part of the Roman Empire was Portugal.


Were the Byzantines Romans or Greeks?

The people of the Byzantine part of the empire were Roman but heavily influenced by the Greek culture. Note that they were Roman, not Italian. The citizens in the eastern part of the empire considered themselves just as "Roman" as the people in the west.The people of the Byzantine part of the empire were Roman but heavily influenced by the Greek culture. Note that they were Roman, not Italian. The citizens in the eastern part of the empire considered themselves just as "Roman" as the people in the west.The people of the Byzantine part of the empire were Roman but heavily influenced by the Greek culture. Note that they were Roman, not Italian. The citizens in the eastern part of the empire considered themselves just as "Roman" as the people in the west.The people of the Byzantine part of the empire were Roman but heavily influenced by the Greek culture. Note that they were Roman, not Italian. The citizens in the eastern part of the empire considered themselves just as "Roman" as the people in the west.The people of the Byzantine part of the empire were Roman but heavily influenced by the Greek culture. Note that they were Roman, not Italian. The citizens in the eastern part of the empire considered themselves just as "Roman" as the people in the west.The people of the Byzantine part of the empire were Roman but heavily influenced by the Greek culture. Note that they were Roman, not Italian. The citizens in the eastern part of the empire considered themselves just as "Roman" as the people in the west.The people of the Byzantine part of the empire were Roman but heavily influenced by the Greek culture. Note that they were Roman, not Italian. The citizens in the eastern part of the empire considered themselves just as "Roman" as the people in the west.The people of the Byzantine part of the empire were Roman but heavily influenced by the Greek culture. Note that they were Roman, not Italian. The citizens in the eastern part of the empire considered themselves just as "Roman" as the people in the west.The people of the Byzantine part of the empire were Roman but heavily influenced by the Greek culture. Note that they were Roman, not Italian. The citizens in the eastern part of the empire considered themselves just as "Roman" as the people in the west.


What was the size of the roman empire from east to west?

The roman empire extended for about 4500 miles from west to east.


How did byzantine break from the west?

The Byzantines did not break from the west. Byzantine Empire is a term which has been coined by historians to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part of this empire. The eastern part of the Roman Empire continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years after the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. The people in question did not use this term. They called their empire Roman Empire or Romania (this referred to this empire and not the country which was later called Romania). The term Byzantine is derived from Byzantium, the Greek city which was redeveloped, turned into the imperial capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and renamed Constantinople by the emperor Constantine the Great in 330. It is used to indicate the fact that not long after the fall of the west, this empire became centred on Greece and Greek in character after it lost most of its non-Greek territories. Greek replaced Latin as the official language of this empire in 620, some 150 years after the fall of the west.