Want this question answered?
nuclear arms race
True. It is a sad fact that nuclear power stations have been inextricablyl inked to a nations nuclear weapons program since the Cold War. Uranium fuel rods are used to produce heat by controlled fission. Spent fuel rods are removed from the reactor and sent to a reprocessing plant where they are chopped up by robotic arms and steeped in acid to dissolve the metals. Plutonium made during the fission process is extracted as a gas by a centrifuge process that separates the isotopes by mass. The heavier Plutonium is then converted back into metal for nuclear weapon warheads. This is why there is such ambivalence to any country adopting nuclear power, however friendly or hostile, by both the general public and governments.
swinging your arms around in circles very quickly
To kill people and destroy a countries buildings/vehicles/and other things that keep it running, simple as that. They have only been used twice in combat and that was in 1945. So realy its to keep tentions high and show others their military power and to make othors think again about invading their country. That's why Russia and Korea etc. make a big deal about their nuclear arsenal. The real killer today is small arms fire!
Robots can have arms legs wheels tracks, or whatever else you want
The invention of the nuclear bomb painted way the mass production of nuclear arms and helped invent nuclear energy
Amy F Woolf has written: 'Nuclear arms control' -- subject(s): Military policy, Nuclear arms control, Nuclear weapons 'START' -- subject(s): Foreign relations, Nuclear arms control, Strategic Arms Reduction Talks 'Nuclear weapons in the U.S. force structure' -- subject(s): Nuclear weapons, Nuclear disarmament 'Nuclear weapons in Russia' -- subject(s): Nuclear arms control, Nuclear weapons 'START' -- subject(s): Foreign relations, Nuclear arms control, Strategic Arms Reduction Talks 'Nonproliferation & threat reduction assistance' -- subject(s): American Technical assistance, Arms control, Nuclear nonproliferation, Weapons of mass destruction 'Nuclear weapons after the Cold War' -- subject(s): Nuclear weapons, Nuclear disarmament, Military policy
its the dang atomic bomb
Nuclear arms race was where Cold War was going with the belief that the more nuclear weapons you had, the more powerful you were
It ended the war in the Pacific. It also ushered in the nuclear arms race and led to the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
We entered the nuclear age and the arms race began.
The nuclear arms race was the core of the cold war.
Warren B. Hayward has written: 'Dear world' -- subject(s): Nuclear arms control, Nuclear disarmament
Ray Perkins has written: 'The ABCs of the Soviet-American nuclear arms race' -- subject(s): Arms race, Military policy, Nuclear arms control, Nuclear weapons
No
Nuclear arms race was where Cold War was going with the belief that the more nuclear weapons you had, the more powerful you were
They would reduce the amount of nuclear arms in the United States and Russia.