That the defendant injured, or caused them some damage, monetary or physical.
While the Law is an extremely complicated subject, and only an attorney is competent to say for sure, in general it is the responsibility of the accuser, or Plaintiff, to prove that what he/she says is true.
In a criminal case it is the accuser. In a civil case - think Judge Judy - it is the Plaintiff
Generally, the plaintiff in a civil case has the burden of proof. The plaintiff must provide enough evidence to convince a judge or jury that her claim should succeed and she should be awarded damages.
The burden usually lies on the plaintiff to prove the elements of their case. However, there is the principal of res ipsa loquitor, which flips the table and requires the defendant to prove they were not negligent.
Unlike a criminal case which requires "beyond a reasonable doubt," a civil case only requires a "preponderance of the evidence. " This is a much lower standard; the plaintiff must only prove their case to about 51 percent certainty.
the plaintiff, that is the person filing the complaint against you.
what web site d.h.s. case
the plaintiff and the defendent
The plaintiff is the person who brings or files the suit. The person who gets sued is the respondent or defendant .
The PLAINTIFF is the party who files (brings) the lawsuit.
"Beyond a reasonable doubt" in a criminal case, "A preponderance of the evidence" in a civil case. The advocate of a case always has the burden of proof - the prosecutor in a criminal case, the plaintiff in a civil case.
Conviction is generally easier to obtain in a civil case than in a criminal case because the burden of proof is lower in civil cases. In civil cases, the plaintiff only needs to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence, which means that it is more likely than not that their claim is true. On the other hand, in criminal cases, the prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a higher standard of proof that can be more challenging to meet.