0
The common good is beneficial to everyone or most everyone.
The common good is better for society because it is beneficial to everyone whereas individual rights only suites the user of the rights. In fact , even the founders of this country even thought that common good was more important because for example: If there were a bunch of people in the movie theater, and one person randomly yelled, "FIRE!," or "HES GOT A GUN!"that would be for the individual rights, not the common good and also would cause major panic. It is not good for everyone because maybe a man who heard that person yell "FIRE"(or the gun) spilled their drink while getting up trying to escape and tripped on an ice cube, fracturing his spine or breaking other bones. This would end up in court and the guy who yelled fire would be guilty because he technically put everyone in the theater in an unsafe situation. Its those who may abuse their rights who defiantly do not
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Anonymous
Anonymous
Wiki User
∙ 11y agofowtangina mo po . thank you :)
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How is law used to manage conflict and protect individual rights and serve the common good in American society?
Laws set guidelines and limit areas of uncertainty.
What kind of government were the Founding Fathers afraid of when they made a point to limit governmental power to protect individual rights?
An Imperialistic government that would decide your rights for you.
What is the relationship between the rights of an individual and the rights of an overall society?
There is none, If we chose to put ourselves in a situation where we have rights. then the point of view can not effect rights, A right can not be changed it can only be denied. there fore there is no relationship between the rights of the individual and the collective other then that the collective has the power to stop the individual from implementing its right if it chooses to do so.
What is Emma Burke's point of view?
Emma Burke's point of view can vary depending on the context. Generally, she is known for advocating for social justice, women's rights, and LGBTQ+ rights. She often speaks out against discrimination and inequality in society.
What does crossing the Rubicon mean in today's society?
Crossing the Rubicon: the pass of a boundary, a limit, a river, a point from which the return is impossible. Or, today, to make an irreversible decision.
Is there a limit to the number of lines that can intersect at one point?
No limit.
Can two lines share a point?
If two lines cross they share a point of intersection. For two straight lines this is limited to one common point, for two circles two points and for complex lines like two sine waves the number of common points has no limit.
What will happen if the boiling point of CAS no 74-83-9 reaches its limit?
The compound is methyl bromide - formerly a very common fumigant for stored goods subject to insect attack. A boiling point is exactly that - a point, a particular temperature at which boiling of a substance takes place. As such it has no limit. As posted the question has no obvious meaning.
What is the limit of proportionality?
limit of proportionality is the point where the spring expands in a non linear way / limit of elasticity is the point where the spring doesn't come back to it original shape
How is the bill of rights limited?
The Bill of Rights is limited at the point where a single person's rights begin to infringe on another person's rights. At this point, the infringing person is not protected by the Bill of Rights.
What is the limit at a point?
let A be any subset of a metric space X a point x belongs to X is called a limit point of A if every neighbourhood of x contain a point of A other than x
What is the difference the proportional limit and the yield point of a spring that has been over stretched?
differece between proportional limit and yield point of a spring?
