The author is highlighting the regenerative ability of seastars, which can regrow lost limbs, as a stark contrast to humans who cannot naturally regenerate limbs. This comparison serves to emphasize the remarkable adaptability of seastars and the limitations of human Biology in terms of regrowth.
Moritz Rosenmund has written: 'Comparing Curriculum-making Processes (Explorationen, Bd. 34.)'
No, because you aren't comparing anything.
Making a choice by comparing total benefit to total cost.
you need to include all of the details in making your generalization
When there is one chromosome missing. Making a pair of chromosomes have one part missing.
Carlson is missing his glasses, making it difficult for him to see clearly.
If a component of photosynthesis is missing, the plant cannot photosynthesis (which means no food) and in turn, dies.
An analogy is making a comparison between two things. An example would be comparing how a heart is like a pump.
It is important because generalizing is a good way of understanding of things because you are gathering information
It came from 4chan..Someone traced the Mario is Missing sprite thus making him. Now lemme eat my lunch. It came from 4chan..Someone traced the Mario is Missing sprite thus making him. Now lemme eat my lunch. It came from 4chan..Someone traced the Mario is Missing sprite thus making him. Now lemme eat my lunch.
[] Supplying the missing subject [] Supplying the missing verb [] Converting the subordinate clause to a complete sentence [x] All of the above
Jay Alamares is an author of children's books, with titles such as "Case of the Missing Crown Jewels" and "Aliens Love Spaghetti". He often incorporates humor and adventure into his stories, making them engaging for young readers.