Want this question answered?
Well Détente really relaxed political tensions between the U.S and S.U and the "salt talks" were to limit the arms race so yes between the U.S and Russia Détente reduced the possibility of nuclear war.
Project 'Manhattan' or to simply say, Nuclear Bombs and the US "Red Scare" in the early 1950s. from then on every country wanted nuclear weapons, And the First to acquire was the US, then Russia, then the United Kingdom, then France, then China, then India, then Pakistan, then North Korea. It is believed that Israel also has them, but they refuse to either confirm or deny. At the peak of the cold war arms race both the US and Russia had more than 10,000 strategic nuclear weapons and roughly 50,000 tactical nuclear weapons each, no other country in the world has ever had more than a few hundred total strategic and tactical nuclear weapons. As of 2014 both the US and Russia have reduced their stockpiles to about 3000 strategic nuclear weapons and zero tactical nuclear weapons (however the US maintains the parts from the dismantled 7000 strategic nuclear weapons and in an emergency could still reassemble them in a few months time into usable weapons, Russia likely has similar ability).
France has reduced it's Carbon emissions by 90% through the creation of the largest group of nuclear reactors per citizen. They produce 77% of their power this way. The United States ranks first in total kiliowatt hours at 101,000 MwH's but only produces 20% of our power this way (shamefully). Slovakia is the most balanced user with about 50% of their power from this awesomely affective method.
It hasn't sad to say. As tech advances so do the weapons, though continueing manufacture in some areas is quieter and less clear to the observer. The number of nukes has been reduced... but not by all. China builds her arsenal today without much concern for the western powers.
False, US involvement in Vietnam was not reduced during the Kennedy administration.
detente
it led to a reduction in tension between the superpowers
... is possible on a showing that the obligor's income has changed substantially.
nuclear weapons effects are devastating. The things and persons in range were reduced to ash the ones further away had bad burns and radiation expousure sickness which cause a lot of suffering. in the related links box below I posted an article on radiation poisoning for more information.
By relying more extensively on fossil fuels. The hell with global warming!Seriously, the use of nuclear energy needs to be expanded, not reduced.
The individualistic perspective. Thus their advocacy of "minarchy", or a government that is substantially reduced in function.
end of the cold war
Brush your teeth or mouthwash buddy
Coma or Death.
Yes. but the chances of getting an answer are reduced.
You can, even though the chances are reduced.
Lack (or reduced) fission products. Fission products emit most of the harmful radiation in fallout.