The Bill of Rights were introduced to Congress in 1789 by James Madison.
A group called the Anti-Federalists wanted to add the Bill of Rights to ensure that personal freedoms would be secure from the large National government that was being proposed.
The Bill of Rights contained ten guaranteed rights, most importantly was the freedom of speech, freedom the press, freedom of religion, the right to peacefully assemble and seek redress of grievances. This First Amendment also forbid the federal government to create any religions. the other nine amendments were also important. For example, in the 8th amendment, excessive bail was forbidden and cruel and unusual punishments for crimes was forbidden.
The Federalists; they were prominently in control from 1789-1800 and added the Bill of Rights to the original United States Constitution.
The Anti-Federalists wanted a smaller, more controlled federal government. They felt that a Bill of Rights would help them achieve that and help the government remain small.
the federalistis
Federalist Party
anti- federalists
up yo ash
No, they are not. The Constitution is the main document that sets up the workings of the federal government. The Bill of Rights is an adjunct to the Constitution that makes clear that the federal government is either prohibited from restricting or mandated to provide certain rights to individuals and to states. Another distinguishing feature is that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were ratified at different times therefore for a brief period of time, the Constitution existed without the Bill of Rights. The Constitution was ratified by three fourths of the states on June 21, 1788. The Bill of Rights was ratified by three fourths of the states on December 15, 1791. The only sense in which they may be considered the same thing is that the Constitution cannot be read without taking into account the Bill of Rights, which represent changes to the Constitution. They are separate parts of a single working document.
Answer It convinced people that the federal government would not be a crazy person
The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.
A book written by oliver ellsworth about why the constitution should be ratified.
Conventions, Not State LegislaturesThe Federalists proposed that the Constitution should be ratified by popularly elected conventions rather than by the state legislatures.
The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.
True :)
the trial of the case should be more than $20
Should the Federal Constitution be amended to protect victims' rights
n Massachusetts, the Constitution ran into serious, organized opposition. Only after two leading Anti-federalists, Adams and Hancock, negotiated a far-reaching compromise did the convention vote for ratification on February 6, 1788 (187-168). Anti-federalists had demanded that the Constitution be amended before they would consider it or that amendments be a condition of ratification; Federalists had retorted that it had to be accepted or rejected as it was. Under the Massachusetts compromise, the delegates recommended amendments to be considered by the new Congress, should the Constitution go into force. The Massachusetts compromise determined the fate of the Constitution, as it permitted delegates with doubts to vote for it in the hope that it would be amended.
The bill of rights is the first part of the U.S constitution. They detail the rights given to citizens and gave the basis on what should be put into the constitution.
The U.S. should have ratified the treaty of versailles because if it did, then maybe we could have helped the league of nations pervent WWII