Want this question answered?
Expressed powers refer to the specific powers granted to the government by the Constitution. These powers outline the authority and responsibilities of each branch of government, ensuring a system of checks and balances. The significance of expressed powers is that they help define the scope and limitations of the government's authority, preventing one branch from becoming too powerful.
The 7 principles of government - popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, federalism, and individual rights - are foundational concepts reflected in the US Constitution. The Constitution establishes the framework for how the government operates and embodies these principles to ensure a system of government that is fair, balanced, and accountable to the people.
Popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, and federalism hope i could help
Popular sovereignty, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, and limited government.
The constitutional powers that help to limit the power of government is dividing it into three branches. The three branches of government are executive, legislative and judiciary.
he used the idea of implied powers to justify a national banks, he argued that the constitution gave congress the power to issue money and regulate trade, and a national bank would clearly help the government carry out responsibilities
constitution can do for people because people wrote constitution with government so it can help and changes for people future
So that no particular part of the government would have too much power. Each branch has a defined and limited role and the ability to check the power of the other branches. Separation of powers and checks and balances help keep government from becoming tyrannical.
The simple answer is the U.S. Constitution.You can read the constitution online in many places.There is disagreement over whether Federal authority currently exceeds constitutional limits and the debate is renewed with many pieces of legislation.Much of the debate stems from the 10th Amendment to the Constitution which reads:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.Read alone, this amendment limits the powers of the Federal government substantially. However, opponents of this point of view often cite Article I Section 8 (on Congressional Powers), which the final paragraph gives the congress the power:To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.In other words, they can make laws which help them carry out their enumerated powers.This brings up the difference between expressed powersand implied powers.Expressed powers are powers which are specifically to the government by the Constitution. Regulating foreign commerce, declaring war and establishing post offices are all expressed powers.Implied powers are powers which are not specifically given to the government, but which the government has assumed, and which have passed judicial review by the Supreme Court. Chartering a bank (currently the Federal Reserve), and creating Social Security are examples of implied powers.If ObamaCare is upheld by the Supreme Court, then regulating healthcare will become an implied power.
It set up a system of government and laws which allowed the branches of the government not to become too powerful. It also help pave the way for the modern government we have today.
The separation of power helps the government. This helps keep power and money.
If your question is 'should the government pay the debts of its citizens' the short answer is "No". The US Federal government has only the powers granted to it by the Constitution, and nowhere in the Constitution will you find anything like the power to pay off private debt, or to bail out banks, for that matter. However, a number of power-hungry bozos have been 're-interpreting' the Constitution for over a hundred years, so it's not surprising people are confused about questions like this one.