Want this question answered?
It isn’t seen as a precedent for future government. The government was well established when it was written.
It is a precedent.
Precedent.
Wendy Holmes has written: 'Protecting the Future'
It's called a "Precedent"
he made an agreement to serve two terms
If a judge has ruled on the same or similar issue in the past, the current and future judges are supposed to abide by that decision unless there is an extreme or compelling reason not to follow the precedent.
Since the issue had never been dealt with before, the judge's ruling set a precedent for how future courts would view the issue.
Ratio decidendi refers to the legal reasoning behind a court's decision that forms the binding precedent in future cases. Obiter dicta are statements or opinions made by the court that are not essential to the decision and do not create binding precedent, but may provide guidance or insight on the case.
The future tense is will create.
Two-Term Limit As President.
Court decision that stands as an example to be followed in future, similar cases.