0
What prevented monarchs from jailing people for purely political reasons and from indefinitely holding prisoners without trial?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
In very general terms, if you're talking about absolute monarchs, nothing. But of course that varies across the time period and the individual monarchs we're talking about.
The problem for a monarch would be if a significant political challenge existed to their authority: for example, a powerful noble who had support from other nobles. Attempting to go after them might just expose how weak the monarch's own political support was.
The writ of Habeas Corpus in England allowed some rights against arbitrary detention, by allowing review by a court. A court was still open to find that a monarch's actions were legitimate, however, if they were viewed as within the scope of royal authority.
A particularly useful device for governments in English history was Acts of Attainder, which were legal declarations that a particular person had committed a particular crime, and was thus liable for punishment. These did not require a trial.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoHabeas Corpus
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What prevented monarchs from jailing people for purely political reasons and from indefinitely holding prisoners without trial.?
In very general terms, if you're talking about absolute monarchs, nothing. But of course that varies across the time period and the individual monarchs we're talking about. The problem for a monarch would be if a significant political challenge existed to their authority: for example, a powerful noble who had support from other nobles. Attempting to go after them might just expose how weak the monarch's own political support was. The writ of Habeas Corpus in England allowed some rights against arbitrary detention, by allowing review by a court. A court was still open to find that a monarch's actions were legitimate, however, if they were viewed as within the scope of royal authority. A particularly useful device for governments in English history was Acts of Attainder, which were legal declarations that a particular person had committed a particular crime, and was thus liable for punishment. These did not require a trial.
What political positions are for life?
Usually dictators or monarchs.
What prevented monarchs from jailing people for purely political reasons and from holding prisoners without trial?
In very general terms, if you're talking about absolute monarchs, nothing. But of course that varies across the time period and the individual monarchs we're talking about. The problem for a monarch would be if a significant political challenge existed to their authority: for example, a powerful noble who had support from other nobles. Attempting to go after them might just expose how weak the monarch's own political support was. The writ of Habeas Corpus in England allowed some rights against arbitrary detention, by allowing review by a court. A court was still open to find that a monarch's actions were legitimate, however, if they were viewed as within the scope of royal authority. A particularly useful device for governments in English history was Acts of Attainder, which were legal declarations that a particular person had committed a particular crime, and was thus liable for punishment. These did not require a trial.
Absolute monarchs combined political religious and what other powers to rule?
economic and military
What was one advantage of the Spanish inquisition for the monarchs of Spain?
It allowed them to silence their political opponents.
Most absolute monarchs combined political religious and what two other powers to rule?
econmic and military
Absolute monarchs combined political religious and what two other powers to rule?
The answer for NovaNET is Economic, Military
Absolute monarchs combined political religious and what two other powers rule?
economic, military for novanet.
How did the enlightenment thinkers reduce the power of European monarchs?
Enlightenment thinkers reduced the power of European monarchs by promoting ideas of individual rights, separation of powers, and limited government. They challenged the divine right of kings and advocated for constitutional monarchies or republics based on the rule of law. These ideals influenced the development of political systems that placed constraints on the absolute authority of monarchs.
How did Enlightenment thinkers' ideas reduce the power of European monarchs?
By suggesting that kings were not given their political power by God.
How did enlightenment thinkers ideas reduce the power European monarchs?
By suggesting that kings were not given their political power by God.
Absolute monarchs combined religion and political what are the other two powers?
money (taxes) which buys power (army)
