Want this question answered?
there was no problem because he did the light bilb in his first try
research the problem.
bm jjkm
maufactring
Mankind has survived thousands of years without the light bulb. We could survive without it now. Thomas Edison was known to mainly improve ideas of others. He was a hard worker and never gave up on his experiments. The electric light was another idea he was going to solve.
This is dumb!
There are two: whether there is a need for their invention, and is their invention original.
Think of creative way to solve the problem and work hard to make that solution possible.
there was no problem because he did the light bilb in his first try
Edison's problem was DC. You would need a generator every few miles. He didn't solve the problem Tesla solved it. AC was a better system.
If your air bag light is on there is a problem. Have the Air Bag system serviced by a qualified service technician. Turning the light off will not solve the problem.
it gives the individual (or firm) with patent protection a property right over its invention.
It is to use science for a practical job or to solve a problem.
it means you can appear the obd code problem, and the obd2 scanner can help you solve this problem.
When you analyze a problem you look it over which is what analyzing means. You look over the problem and then you solve it. When you solve a problem you solve it and you use certain steps and solve it but of course everyone has there ways to solve a problem but some people have ways to solve it by just analysing it. That is the difference.
No of course not, just because he made the telephone doesn't mean his wife and mother aren't going to be deaf. They still can't hear but they inspired him to create his invention,
It didn't solve any problem it was invented as a sport not as a way to solve anything...