0
What problem might a historian have when trying to use this as a source for a historical argument apex?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which type of historical text typically focuses on a particular topic integrating primary and secondary source documents to advance an argument?
monogragh
What would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?
Primary source
A historian is interested in studying the role of women during the Industrial Revolution. He finds a recently published secondary source that includes the information in the box below. Which of the fo?
Understanding the historical context of a 19th-century women's rights poster. apex
What is historical sources?
A historical source can be anything. A letter, diary, painting, newspaper, anything.
Jefferson's Declaration of Independence is a secondary source.?
No, it's a primary source historical document.
What Problem Might A Historian Have When Trying To Use This Book As A Source For A Historical Argument?
Which book are you asking about? As it stands, this is an unanswerable question. I suspect the question is quoted from a homework assignment associated with some book.
Why bias a problem in a historical source?
Hehrh
Is braveheart a reliable source for a historian?
No, it's based on a real person, but the film is Hollywood at its historical worst. I enjoyed the film as entertainment, but from an historical point of view it utter twaddle.
Which English theologian and historian wrote Ecclesiacstical History of the English Nation an important historical source of early English history?
Bede
Why would a historian use primary source when studying about a historical event?
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
Why would a historian use a primary source when studying about historical event?
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
What makes a source useful for a historian?
A source is useful for a historian if it is contemporary to the events being studied, is reliable and trustworthy, and provides valuable insights or information that can help in understanding the historical context. Additionally, sources that offer multiple perspectives or viewpoints are often considered valuable for historians.
Which type of historical text typically focuses on a particular topic integrating primary and secondary source documents to advance an argument?
monogragh
What if true would suggest that the historian's document is a strong source of evidence for historical interpretation?
Undoubtedly the historian's document is a positive and strong source of evidence for historical interpretation provided it is not affected by personal prejudices, selfish national interests or affiliations. History is seldom honest. Mostly it has been mis-interpreted and distorted because of certain vested interests - may be it be the history of Aryans, Greek, Roman or American History
What kind of source would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?
You would consult a primary source for a first and personal view of an historical event. Primary sources are original materials.
What is an historical source?
a place or source that one may find historical information or artifacts.
What might the historian using thinking skill of primary sourc analysis?
The historian using the thinking skill of primary source analysis is focused on critically evaluating original documents or artifacts to interpret historical events or trends. They assess the credibility, bias, and context of the sources to draw accurate conclusions about the past. This skill is essential for constructing well-supported arguments and understanding the complexities of historical narratives.
