0
A source is useful for a historian if it is contemporary to the events being studied, is reliable and trustworthy, and provides valuable insights or information that can help in understanding the historical context. Additionally, sources that offer multiple perspectives or viewpoints are often considered valuable for historians.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does a historian ask himself to decide if a primary source is usable or not for his research?
A historian may ask themselves the following questions to determine if a primary source is usable: Is the source contemporary to the events being studied? Is the author credible and knowledgeable about the subject matter? Is there bias or perspective that needs to be considered when interpreting the source?
A person who studies the past?
Historian.
What would a historian using the thinking skill of primary source analysis do?
A historian using the thinking skill of primary source analysis would carefully examine and evaluate original sources from a particular time period or event, such as letters, diaries, photographs, or official documents. They would look for biases, perspectives, context, and credibility within these sources to better understand the past and draw informed conclusions about historical events.
What is the correct name for a historian's 'clues'?
The correct name for a historian's 'clue' is sources.
What is the main source of water on earth?
The main source of water on Earth is the oceans, which cover approximately 71% of the planet's surface. These saltwater bodies contain about 97% of the Earth's water.
What does a historian do when he or she points out problem with an argument?
The historian makes a counterclaim.
What does a historian do when he or she points problems with an argument?
The historian makes a counterclaim.
What does a historian do when he she points out problems with an argument?
The historian makes a counterclaim.
What does a historian do when he or points out problems with an argument?
The historian makes a counterclaim.
What does a historian when he or she points out problems with an argument?
The historian makes a counterclaim.
What adaptation makes a snail useful for an aquarium?
They eat algae, aerate the gravel, and provide a food source for fish and other tank-mates.
What does a historian ask himself to decide if a primary source is usable or not for his research?
A historian may ask themselves the following questions to determine if a primary source is usable: Is the source contemporary to the events being studied? Is the author credible and knowledgeable about the subject matter? Is there bias or perspective that needs to be considered when interpreting the source?
Would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?
Primary source
Does a source becomes evidence only when a historian uses it to prove something?
yes
What would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?
Primary source
Which best explains how a historian synthesized evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
