0
Does a source becomes evidence only when a historian uses it to prove something?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
yes
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What question should a writer ask when choosing evidence to support a claim?
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
What might a historian using the thinking skill of primary source analysis do?
Interview civilians who are currently living in war zone
What is an example of a primary source that a historian might use to study the colonial era?
What are three examples of primary sources a hitorisn might use
Definition of a secondary source?
A secondry source is a source that does not come from the time that a historian is studying for example: -A book about world war 1 is a secondry source because it did not come from the time a historian was sdudying it got it's information from another source
What is the definition of empirical evidence?
Empirical evidence is a source of knowledge acquired by means of observation or experimentation. The term comes from the Greek word for experience, Εμπειρία.
What if true would suggest that the historian's document is a strong source of evidence for historical interpretation?
Undoubtedly the historian's document is a positive and strong source of evidence for historical interpretation provided it is not affected by personal prejudices, selfish national interests or affiliations. History is seldom honest. Mostly it has been mis-interpreted and distorted because of certain vested interests - may be it be the history of Aryans, Greek, Roman or American History
Should it be a law to recyle and what is the source?
It is a matter of opinion. When something becomes necessary and critical it is superfluous to make it law.There is no source to recycling, the source of law is the government.
Which best explains how a historian synthesize evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
Example of historical context?
Example of historical evidence would be anything that was dug up from history. A primary source.
What textual evidence is?
Words from a text that are used to support an essay's claim. Textual evidence is evidence used to support an argument using something from another source. Typically shown as a quote or a paraphrase of the text used.
What is an example of a primary source?
Primary sources (in history) are things such as documents produced at the time. A secondary source is something written later by a historian. Good examples of primary source documents are legal notices, letters, diaries, newspapers, maps, flags, important documents, clothes, and even furniture.
What is a great example primary source?
Primary sources (in history) are things such as documents produced at the time. A secondary source is something written later by a historian. Good examples of primary source documents are legal notices, letters, diaries, newspapers, maps, flags, important documents, clothes, and even furniture.
What does a historian ask himself to decide if a primary source is usable or not for his research?
A historian may ask themselves the following questions to determine if a primary source is usable: Is the source contemporary to the events being studied? Is the author credible and knowledgeable about the subject matter? Is there bias or perspective that needs to be considered when interpreting the source?
Would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?
Primary source
What would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?
Primary source
Would a story about Persian wars still be a primary source if it were written by a historian?
No, a primary source is a contemporary account. To write it now creates a secondary source.
