by providing them with foreign aid.
The United Nations attempted to offer solutions to help Kuwait City. Yet, Arab nations were reluctant to accept international intervention for security commitments to Kuwait.
The horror of WW1 made both countries reluctant to rearm.
The homonym of reluctant is "willing".
Yes. Myanmar, Liberia, and the USA have refused so far.
The opposite of reluctant is "willing."
Reluctant is the correct spelling.
The answer is primarily three fold. The first part is that the science, contrary to popular belief is not exactly settled. There is a reluctance to cause massive reductions in food supplies and lifestyles for something that may not actually help any known issue. The second part is the enormous cost and lifestyle reduction that is being requested by only some countries and not any organized worldwide reduction. It is hard to ask the people of the United States to reduce their lifestyles by 50% while allowing other countries to increase their lifestyle unabated. The third issue is what the outcome would be if we did reduce. Man produces only a small portion of the total annual output of CO2 (about 3%). Nature creates the rest. Levels of CO2 have been rising fairly consistently for over 10,000 years. The total shutdown of CO2 generation by humans would have only a minimal impact on levels of CO2 yet cause mass reductions in our lives and population levels. Governments tend to try to avoid doing things that make their voting constituents suffer with very little to show for it.
AnswerMexico, Central & South America, Italy, Canada, Poland, Spain, and most of the predominately Catholic countries. The Scandinavian countries are the most accepting of evolution.
No, eager is an antonym of reluctant.
No it can't. Reluctant is an adjective. Reluctantly is an adverb.
The Reluctant Widow was created in 1946.