answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
  • They believe reducing greenhouse gases will reduce the standard of living in their countries.
  • Most of the emissions come from just a few rich nations.
  • They believe reducing greenhouse gases will not make a difference on climate change.
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What reasons are various countries reluctant to make firm commitments to make deep reductions in greenhouse gases?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Some countries are reluctant to have contact with other countries. What do these countries lose by limiting contact with other countries?

by providing them with foreign aid.


Were any solutions attempted to help Kuwait City?

The United Nations attempted to offer solutions to help Kuwait City. Yet, Arab nations were reluctant to accept international intervention for security commitments to Kuwait.


Why weren't Britain and France ready to take on Germany?

The horror of WW1 made both countries reluctant to rearm.


What is the homonym of reluctant?

The homonym of reluctant is "willing".


Were any countries reluctant to adopt the si units as their measurement system?

Yes. Myanmar, Liberia, and the USA have refused so far.


What is the opposite of reluctant?

The opposite of reluctant is "willing."


How do you spell reluctant?

Reluctant is the correct spelling.


Why are some governments reluctant to reduce their greenhouse gases?

The answer is primarily three fold. The first part is that the science, contrary to popular belief is not exactly settled. There is a reluctance to cause massive reductions in food supplies and lifestyles for something that may not actually help any known issue. The second part is the enormous cost and lifestyle reduction that is being requested by only some countries and not any organized worldwide reduction. It is hard to ask the people of the United States to reduce their lifestyles by 50% while allowing other countries to increase their lifestyle unabated. The third issue is what the outcome would be if we did reduce. Man produces only a small portion of the total annual output of CO2 (about 3%). Nature creates the rest. Levels of CO2 have been rising fairly consistently for over 10,000 years. The total shutdown of CO2 generation by humans would have only a minimal impact on levels of CO2 yet cause mass reductions in our lives and population levels. Governments tend to try to avoid doing things that make their voting constituents suffer with very little to show for it.


Which races or countries or states are most reluctant in accepting evolution as the reason man exists?

AnswerMexico, Central & South America, Italy, Canada, Poland, Spain, and most of the predominately Catholic countries. The Scandinavian countries are the most accepting of evolution.


Is eager a synonym for reluctant?

No, eager is an antonym of reluctant.


Can reluctant be a verb?

No it can't. Reluctant is an adjective. Reluctantly is an adverb.


When was The Reluctant Widow created?

The Reluctant Widow was created in 1946.