0
The prayer was considered "non-denominational," but it is reasonable to argue that the prayer was primarily protestant in nature. The major opponents to the prayer were Jewish organizations.
Case Citation:
Engel v. Vitale, 370 US 421 (1962)
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The case of Engel v. Vitale said a state sponsored prayer was against the constitution?
true (:
How did Engel v. Vitale begin?
Engel v. Vitale began in the Union Free School District No. 9, in Hyde Park, New York, after parents of ten students objected to the New York Board of Regents' formal introduction of prayer into the schools and complained that directing the prayer to "Almighty God" was contradictory to their religious practices.Case Citation:Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962)
What was the result of the supreme court's ruling in engel v. Vitale?
Teaching religion in public schools was forbidden.
What was the result of the Supreme Court ruling in engel v. vitale?
Teaching religion in public schools was forbidden.
Was the case that said state-sponsored prayer was against the Constitution Engel v. Vitale?
true (:
Was Engel v. Vitale considered a landmark case?
Yes. Engel v. Vitale was the first US Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of prayer in the public schools, and determined the practice was a violation of the First Amendment Establishment Clause.Case Citation:Engel v. Vitale, 370 US 421 (1962)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What were the consequences of the decision in the US Supreme Court case Engel v Vitale?
Engel v. Vitale, (1962) was the first of numerous cases challenging the constitutionality of prayer in public school as a violation of the First Amendment Establishment Clause. The decision in this case ruled organized prayer in public schools unconstitutional (private prayer is acceptable under the Free Exercise Clause).The most obvious consequence is that public (tax-supported) schools can no longer promote or teach religion, respecting the rights of those with different beliefs (including atheism) or different secular practices than those conducted at school.Some claim removing religion from the schools has resulted in everything from higher pregnancy rates to increased violence and other negative outcomes. None of these claims can be substantiated, however.Case Citation:Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
When did Engel v Vitale begin?
Engel v. Vitale, (1962) began in the Union Free School District No. 9 in Hyde Park, New York, and was originally heard in the New York State court system.More InformationEngel v. Vitale, (1962) was the first major constitutional challenge to the exercise of religion, specifically prayer, in public schools. The US Supreme Court held the practice to be a violation of the First Amendment Establishment Clause.The case originated in the Union Free School District No. 9, in Hyde Park, New York, after parents of ten students objected to the New York Board of Regents' formal introduction of prayer into the schools and complained that directing the prayer to "Almighty God" was contradictory to their religious practices.Case Citation:Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962)For more information about Engel v. Vitale, and the Supreme Court's views about prayer in public schools, see Related Questions, below.
Which type of law is Engel v. Vitale an example of?
Constitutional lawCase Citation:Engel v. Vitale, 370 US 421 (1962)
In what state did Engel v Vitale originate?
New York StateCase Citation:Engel v. Vitale, 370 US 421 (1962)
Who was the plaintiff in the trial of Engel v Vitale?
The Petitioners (Engel), a group of ten parents of students in the Union Free School District No. 9, in Hyde Park, New York, prevailed over the New York Board of Regents. The parents objected to a state law permitting recitation of prayer in public school, based largely on the prayer being directed to "Almighty God," a practice contradictory to their religious beliefs.The US Supreme Court held that organized prayer in public school was a violation of the First Amendment Establishment Clause.Case Citation:Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962)For more information about Engel v. Vitale and prayer in public schools, see Related Questions, below.
Who were the parties to Engel v. Vitale?
Steven L. Engel was the nominal petitioner (comparable to a plaintiff) in Engel v. Vitale, but his name was used to represent a group of ten families in Hyde Park, New York, who objected on religious grounds to a state law mandating schools lead students in a brief prayer at the start of each day.The nominal respondent (comparable to a defendant) was William J. Vitale, in his capacity as President of the Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 9 (aka Herricks School District).Case Citation:Engel v. Vitale, 370 US 421 (1962)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
