Want this question answered?
A bench warrant
A writ of habeas corpus.
A court order telling an officer to bring a prisoner to the court is called a writ of habeas corpus.
True
Habeas crpus ad subjiciendum - which is a writ that compels a person who is detaining another to produce the body of the prisoner. The writ is used to test the legality of the detention of the prisoner. It is typically shortened to "habeas corpus."
No, the prisoner will have to take the medicine if a court order is placed. He can hire a lawyer and fight the court order.
The Miranda laws and the 4th Amendment to the Constitution require an explanation of denial of bail.
The question is unclear. Except in the smallest of jurisdictions, the police are usually not responsible for ensuring the transport of each and every single prisoner to court. That function is usually handled by the Detention Deputies of the local Sheriff's Office.If that is not the information you are looking for, please re-word and re-submit the question.Additional Information:Two possible answers to this question are the writ of habeas corpus, which is a court order and an arrestee's right to an initial appearance before a court after an arrest under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5, which is not a court order.The writ of habeas corpus is a court order directing anyone having the custody of an individual to bring that individual before the court for an inquiry into the legitimacy of that person's detention. However, this is not something that "requires that police must bring EACH prisoner to court" as the question is phrased. It is issued only upon specific application by someone on behalf of a specific individual.The requirement that police must bring EACH and every prisoner to court is the right of individuals to what is called an "initial appearance." This is embodied in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5, rather than a court order. Rule 5 requires that every person arrested (with certain exceptions stated within the Rule) must be brought before the court for an inquiry into the legality of the person's arrest and detention and an explanation of the person's rights. At this point in time the individual is a "prisoner" in the sense that he/she is under arrest and detention, but is not a "prisoner" in the sense of having being convicted and in prison serving a sentence.Note that this rule governs federal criminal procedure. Criminal procedure among the states will vary according to their own rules, but since most state rules are modeled on the federal rules, any variation will be minimal.
A writ having for its object to bring a party before a court or judge; especially, one to inquire into the cause of a person's imprisonment or detention by another, with the view to protect the right to personal liberty; also, one to bring a prisoner into court to testify in a pending trial.
yes, a prisoner can choose to not eat their food. However, if they are starving, the prisoner can get a court order to force feed them.
The writ of habeas corpus. This is a court order directing a person who is holding another person in custody to bring the prisoner to the court and show cause why the prisoner should not be se free. It is not exactly a legal document in existence like the Constitution. A person had to apply to the court for the writ either through a lawyer, friend or family to obtain the writ.
A prisoner can choose to not take his medicine unless a court order is given.