It varied according to the different peoples throughout the ancient world.
No there were no social classes in the Apache tribe.
Well, since prosperity is economic success and social classes are people who are alike...(social classes-a group of people who have similar backgrounds, income(money), and way of living) Prosperity lead to social classes by people learning more about each other and exploring. Thank you!!!!!!!!!! have fun in social studies....
The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.
The patricians were the Roman aristocracy.
Pharaohs had a lot of rights, I know that much. Slaves didn't have very many rights, I'm guessing, because they're slaves. And, I really don't know the other rights, these were just ibvious, so yeah.
Pharaoh had all the freedom since he was a god-like being. Priests and Nobles had all the freedom since their the 2nd tier below the Pharaoh. The Middle classes had some what freedom except for the farmers since they had to grow crops for the Pharaoh. The Slaves are the Low classes which have no freedom whatso ever since they are the people who have to do most of the work out of all the social classes like they have to build houses or the town and stuff.
The modern social concept of personal rights and freedoms did not exist back at that time.
The modern social concept of personal rights and freedoms did not exist back at that time.
No there were no social classes in the Apache tribe.
Well, since prosperity is economic success and social classes are people who are alike...(social classes-a group of people who have similar backgrounds, income(money), and way of living) Prosperity lead to social classes by people learning more about each other and exploring. Thank you!!!!!!!!!! have fun in social studies....
Rights refer to political, economic, social, and other advantages to which someone has a just claim, morally or in law. One official definition of the word rights is "that which is morally correct, just, or honorable."
Eva Peron was more popular among the lower social classes in Argentina for her advocacy for workers' rights and social welfare programs. The higher social classes had mixed feelings towards her due to her populist policies and perceived challenge to their economic interests.
Social and economic freedom, due process of law and basic people's rights. Libertarianism is the main concept people think of today.
Freedom varies worldwide depending on political, social, and economic factors. While some countries prioritize individual liberties and human rights, others have more restrictions on freedom of speech, expression, and movement. Overall, the level of freedom experienced by people around the world can differ significantly.
The ultimate symbol of social equality in the 1920s was the popularization of the automobile. Owning a car was seen as a sign of freedom and mobility, allowing people of various social classes to travel independently and socialize in new ways.
One charter right and freedom you can consider for your social assignment is the right to freedom of expression. This includes the freedom to express your thoughts, beliefs, and opinions through speech, writing, and other forms of communication without censorship or interference. It is protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The social change in Great Britain included increased demands for political rights and reforms, such as expanded voting rights and workers' rights. This led to movements such as Chartism that advocated for greater democracy and representation. The middle and working classes in Britain were inspired by the political freedoms enjoyed by US citizens and pushed for similar reforms in their own country.