Your question is too vague for an answer. You need to specify which colonists and which policies.
no
their rights as British subjects had been violated.Taxation without representation
No,they can not.
First, Your civil rights (if you're meaning constitutional) can't be violated by a private company. The constitution only protects you from the government. If a government agency violated your rights you, but preferably an attorney, can file a claim in federal court. Some organizations like the ACLU will offer services for free. Other attorneys will want payment up front, a part of the judgment (or in most cases the settlement), or will offer their serves pro bono.
The Declaration of Independence says Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; they have a right to throw gov't. - See more at: http://www.chacha.com/question/what-does-jefferson-claim-the-colonists-have-done-every-time-their-rights-have-been-repressed-or-taken-away,-in-the-declaration-of-independence#sthash.AOFVxKQA.dpuf
Generally, yes. Almost any group or company can be sued. Whether rights have been violated, though, is a matter for the courts. I can't claim that my religion demands that the government grant me special privileges or goods, and then sue for violation.
It is either a claim for a fire or it is any type of homeowners claims since homeowners policies used to be called fire policies.
The thing about the Stamp Act is that it was an internal tax, unlike the Sugar Act before it, and internal taxes were designed to raise revenue for the crown and had far wider effects. The colonists (well, Grenville and his supporters) felt that Parliament could not tax any British subjects unless they enjoyed representation. Many colonists also felt that the Stamp Act forced them to either confront the issue of parliamentary taxation head-on or to give up on any claim to rights of self-government. So, in answer to your question, I would assume that they felt it violated the idea of representation or perhaps self-government (both of which were important to patriots), and they would not accept virtual representation for themselves.
It is a claim for the mineral rights on a price of property, regardless of who owns the rest of the rights. Sometimes the mineral rights are the most valuable rights and in other cases they are worthless.
The rights claimed by the First Continental Congress included:A right not to be taxed without the consent of the peopleTrial by jury in the coloniesRight to petition the king or either house of parliamentAll other rights of subjects of BritainThere is a link below to the text of the Declaration of Rights and Grievances.
The rights claimed by the First Continental Congress included:A right not to be taxed without the consent of the peopleTrial by jury in the coloniesRight to petition the king or either house of parliamentAll other rights of subjects of BritainThere is a link below to the text of the Declaration of Rights and Grievances.
An ex-wife has no claim nor rights in her ex-husband's estate.An ex-wife has no claim nor rights in her ex-husband's estate.An ex-wife has no claim nor rights in her ex-husband's estate.An ex-wife has no claim nor rights in her ex-husband's estate.